Objectives: Data on acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in developing countries is scarce. In this report, we analyze the temporal trends in the management and outcomes of a large series of ACS patients hospitalized at the American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC), a tertiary referral university hospital located in a middle income Middle Eastern developing country. Methods: A total of 1025 consecutive patients hospitalized and discharged with the diagnosis of ACS were enrolled between 2002 and 2005. The utilization of evidence-based therapies and in-hospital outcomes were determined. Results: The study enrolled 228 patients (22%) with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), 275 patients (27%) with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and 522 patients (51%) with unstable angina. The STEMI group was younger and had a higher percentage of men. The utilization rates of coronary angiography and percutaneouscoronary intervention (PCI) were highest in the STEMI group. Comparison to earlier ACS data (1997)(1998) from the same hospital, showed an increase in the utilization of reperfusion therapy, coronary angioplasty, bypass surgery, aspirin, β-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzymes (ACE), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), and statins over the past decade (P < .05). This was associated with a significant decrease in hospital mortality (13%-7.7%, P < .01). Conclusions: This study analyzes one of the largest series of ACS patients reported from a single center in a developing country. The utilization of evidence-based therapies in the management of ACS at AUBMC has improved significantly over the past decade with an associated decrease in hospital mortality.
Background-Traditional cardiovascular risk factors lead to endothelial injury and activation of leucocytes and platelets that initiate and propagate atherosclerosis. We proposed that clopidogrel therapy in patients with stable CAD imparts a pleiotropic effect that extends beyond anti-platelet aggregation to other athero-protective processes.
The proposed 2020 Core Curriculum for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions aims to provide an updated European consensus that defines the level of experience and knowledge in the field of percutaneous cardiovascular intervention (PCI). It promotes homogenous education and training programmes among countries, and is the cornerstone of the new EAPCI certification, designed to support the recognition of competencies at the European level and the free movement of certified specialists in the European Community. It is based on a thorough review of the ESC guidelines and of the EAPCI textbook on percutaneous interventional cardiovascular medicine. The structure of the current core curriculum evolved from previous EAPCI core curricula and from the "2013 core curriculum of the general cardiologist" to follow the current ESC recommendations for core curricula. In most subject areas, there was a wide -if not unanimous -consensus among the task force members on the training required for the interventional cardiologist of the future. The document recommends that acquisition of competence in interventional cardiology requires at least two years of postgraduate training, in addition to four years devoted to cardiology. The first part of the curriculum covers general aspects of training and is followed by a comprehensive description of the specific components in 54 chapters. Each of the chapters includes statements of the objectives, and is further subdivided into the required knowledge, skills, behaviours, and attitudes.
KEYWORDS • miscellaneous* Level I and II intervention skills may be acquired outside the primary training centre, as part of a cooperation programme. ** Level V intervention skills are not expected in all areas at the end of the two years of training in interventional cardiology.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.