Curatorship is one of the important areas of university’s educational and training work, it contributes to the formation of competent, highly moral young professionals who clearly represent their place in society. The work of the curator of the student group should be purposeful and systematic. The system of interaction between the teacher and the student helps to solve educational issues, transfer to students the accumulated experience, knowledge, traditions, resolve disputes and conflict situations, influence the formation of personality and professionalism. Educational work requires the curator to make a big calculation in terms of spending time on the group. Its main content represents the most difficult process — it is to live the life of a supervised group, the problems and joys of student life. Only then the educational work of the curator will have a significant impact on the quality of training of students.

The article analyzes a sociological survey of students on the topic “Supervisor in the eyes of the student”. The aim of the article is to find an answer to the question whether a university student needs a supervisor. The sociological survey was conducted in 2022 with the participation of 1st and 2nd year students of Bashkir State Agrarian University. The sample population was 642 students aged 17 to 25. The ratio of male and female students in the sample was 57 and 43%, the ratio of 1st and 2nd year students was 56.7 and 43.3%, respectively. The survey questions covered all aspects of the supervisor’s activities, such as monitoring, organizational, informational, etc. This allowed the most complete analysis of the relationship “supervisor – student” and identify the role of the supervisor in the academic group.

No abstract

No abstract

Gastrointestinal and respiratory diseases of young farm animals account for the largest percentage of all diseases. Currently, vaccines have been developed and successfully used for the specific prevention of diseases of infectious etiology, but it is not always possible to develop immunity of sufficient intensity, since vaccination without immunostimulation does not contribute to sufficient antibody formation. One of the important tasks of practical veterinary medicine was to find environmentally safe immunocorregulating substances that do not have a suppressive effect on the body. It was established that the drug ferran activated hematopoietic reactions of the body. Ferran in combination with enterozyme restores immunopoiesis and erythropoiesis to the indicators of physiological norms. The combined use of enterozyme with propolis hasda high immunostimulating effect, enhanced the productive phase of the immune response, removed the suppressive effect of the vaccine and increased the factors of natural and colonization resistance of the intestine.