The Electronic judiciary is a policy issued by e-court launching. This was to address global challenges as well as to realize the acceleration of case management. During the pandemic, litigation becomes hampered because it has to reduce physical contact in implementing health protocols. Therefore, the problems of case management that were previously done offline should begin to be diverted by optimizing the function of the e-court. Thus, the implementation of technology information is very important to ensure the court running process. The development of electronic judiciary is carried out by comparing with several countries to become evaluation and reference material. The goal is to make the electronic judiciary more accessible and easier to use by the public. The method used is a qualitative approach with policy conceptual comparison. The result is that the e-court must be able to facilitate up to the administrative process, the trial, until the verdict.

Bailiffs are part of the judicial apparatus who have the task of executing decisions. The execution is vital to enforce the law for people who seek justice; however, during the Covid-19 pandemic, many executions must be delayed and switched by implementing virtual applications. Bailiffs faced many problems in adapting to a virtual task since there is no training to use these judicial applications. This paper's focussed issue is training needs analysis for bailiffs to do execution in the current pandemic era. The goal is to improve the competence of bailiffs as judicial apparatus. The method used was quantitative using a survey distributed to bailiffs in general, religion and state administrative court. The result was that bailiffs needed the training to improve their competence, especially using court applications and psychological and mass negotiation skills.