The discovery of potentially habitable conditions on Europa and Enceladus has led to an increased interest in searching for extant life in these locations (Chyba & Phillips, 2002;Porco et al., 2017). There is a consensus that multiple lines of evidence will be required to provide the extraordinary proof required to support any claims of the detection of extraterrestrial life (Hand et al., 2017). Among the possible lines of evidence, chemical biosignatures are considered key because of the way that life is expected to leave an imprint on chemical distributions, or by the presence of chemical complexity, that is difficult to explain via abiotic processes (Lovelock, 1965;McKay, 2004). Amino acids are among the targets that could be used to determine the presence of life beyond Earth (Neveu et al., 2018). Amino acids are the core of terrestrial life as the building blocks of proteins (Aerts et al., 2020), but are also found in meteorites, which indicates they do not have an Earth-specific origin (Glavin et al., 2010;Pizzarello et al., 2012). For this reason, the detection of one or more of the typical "meteoritic/abiotic" amino acids is not indicative of life, although detecting multiple more complex members of this compound class would suggest biotic processes. Fortunately, instead of relying only on the detection of certain amino acids, we can use their relative distributions to establish their biotic or abiotic origin. The first relative distribution is related to chiral forms of amino acids and expressed by enantiomeric excess. Life on Earth uses mostly left-handed amino acids, while abiotic samples contain mixtures of both chiral forms. The second distribution is related to the overall complexity of amino acids, as expressed by the ratio of each amino acid to the simplest one, glycine. While abiotic processes tend to produce simpler, easier to synthesize amino acids like glycine, amino acids produced biotically tend to be more complex as a requirement for protein functionality. Therefore, the determination of both enantiomeric excesses and relative abundances of amino acids could provide strong evidence of biogenicity (Creamer et al., 2017;McKay, 2004).A key challenge for amino acid analysis is their release from cells or proteins present in the sample. The gold standard method to achieve this in terrestrial laboratories is acid hydrolysis. While some alteration of amino acids can occur during this treatment (Kaiser & Benner, 2005;Pickering & Newton, 1990), it is overall a robust method for assessing amino acid distributions. However, implementing an extraction that requires 6 N HCl heated up to 110°C for 24 hr involves considerable developmental and operational risks which would significantly complicate