The article presents the results of a study of one of the least known areas of the Russian anthropological tradition, which arose and developed in the interdisciplinary philosophical and theological space of Orthodox thought of the XIX-XX centuries. The authors of the article characterize the most important differences in this interdisciplinary field of anthropological research, referring to several key episodes (cases) of its history. First of all its disciplinary genesis is analyzed -in the writings of the thinkers of the circle of Metropolitan Philaret (Drozdov), where the term Antropologia Theologica (or theological «chelovekoslovie», theological anthropology) arises; the same thinkers systematize and clarify the fundamental concepts of Christian anthropology, both in its Eastern Byzantine version, and those that arised in the historically close Western, Lutheran. Then in the article are proposed the results of the analysis of the works of Bishop Feofan (Govorov), where the Orthodox dominant is developed for a rational and holistic understanding of a person, his nature and composition, which can not be reduced to rational (Aristotelian) human anatomy but containing a certain social minimum of self-movement reasonable social and personal action. Finally in the article are discussed the features of the scientific experimental and philosophical-theological approaches of Archbishop Luke (Voyno-Yasenetsky), medical scientist, philosopher and theologian, continuing the history of a rational and historically diverse Antropologia Theologica.

The purpose of the article is to identify the problems inherent in the current stage of higher education in the field of economic security, on the basis of analysis and assessment of the state of personnel training for "Economic Security" specialty, and develop recommendations on the formation of an educational trajectory in the training of economic security professionals based on the principles of continuity education. When writing the article, both general scientific and special methods of scientific knowledge were used: scientific abstraction, dialectical, induction and deduction, analysis and synthesis, detailing and generalization, systemic, comparative, sociological. Identified the problems of training of the specialists in the field of economic security. The analysis and assessment of the state of training of the personnel in the field of economic security is supported by the results of an empirical study carried out using a standardized questionnaire survey of students studying in this specialty. This allowed us to assess their motivation in choosing a profession related to economic security, to identify the positive and negative components of the educational process and to justify the recommendations for the formation of an educational trajectory aimed at long life learning.

Single-industry towns occupy a special place in the system of regional economic development of Russia. To date, domestic practice has accumulated significant experience in the management of mono-profile areas. In fact, its own model of mono-education management, which includes an individual set of tools for socio-economic impact, has been developed. The institute of development of single-industry towns was formed into a complete system of tested mechanisms and organizational forms of their implementation. The basic directions of support of monoprofile territories are defined, the bodies of development of single-industry towns are created, the complex programs of development of monoformations are tested and adjusted. The process of development of mono-territories has passed to the “post-institutional” stage, when the system of institutions for single-industry towns management (Single-Industry Towns Development Fund), tested in practice, has been subjected to scientific and public criticism, and to date is able to effectively generate a qualitatively different level of influence on the socio-economic situation of cities of the mono-profile type.

No abstract

No abstract