Трансплантация гемопоэтических стволовых клеток (ТГСК) является ведущим методом лечения злокачественных заболеваний системы крови и наследственных заболеваний, а также ряда солидных опухолей у детей, подразделяется на аутологичную (ауто-ТГСК) и аллогенную (алло-ТГСК) трансплантации. Проведение ТГСК осуществляется с учетом показаний, наличия донора-родственного, неродственного, гаплоидентичного, с применением режимов кондиционирования различной интенсивности (миело аблативные, режимы кондиционирования сниженной интенсивности доз, немиелоаблативные), профилактики реакции «трансплантат против хозяина», которая является ведущим осложнением. Наряду с цитостатическим воздействием при выполнении алло-ТГСК осуществляется иммуноадоптивный эффект-«трансплантат против лейкоза».

The pathogenetic relationship of kidney damage and an aberrant clone of the B-cell line producing nephrotoxic monoclonal immunoglobulin underlies the concept of “monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance” (MGRS). Herein the aberrant clone does not reach the criteria necessary for initiating antitumor therapy according to oncohematological indications. MGRS is a new nosology in modern nephrology and oncohematology. Monoclonal protein’s pathological effects on kidney parenchyma result in irreversible decline of kidney function till the end stage renal disease that in line with the position of International Consensus of hematologists and nephrologists determinates critical necessity for clone specific treatment in patients with MGRS despite the absence of hematological indications for treatment initiation. Main challenge of MGRS in Russian Federation is an inaccessibility of an in-time diagnostic and appropriate treatment for the great majority of patients due to the following reasons: i) limited knowledge about the MGRS among hematologists and nephrologists; ii) lack of necessary diagnostic resources in most health-care facilities; iii) lack of approved clinical recommendations and medical economic standards for treatment of this pathological entity. In order to overcome these limitations, leading oncohematologists and nephrologists of the Russian Federation on behalf of professional communities at the end of 2019 published a conciliation document: “Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance: Consensus of hematologists and nephrologists of Russia on the establishment of nosology, diagnostic approach and rationale for clone specific treatment”. Consensus document comprises the opinion of experts – leading nephrologists and hematologists of Russian Federation – on the problem of MGRS including the incoherence in nosology classification, diagnostics approach and rationale for clone specific treatment. Consensus document is based on conclusions and agreements reached during the conference of leading nephrologists and hematologists of Russia which was held in the framework of symposia “Plasma cell dyscrasias and lymphoproliferative diseases: modern approaches to therapy”, 15–16 of March 2019, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, Saint Petersburg, Russia. Consensus is intended to define the principal practical steps to resolve the problem of MGRS in Russian Federation that are summarized as final clauses which we present here.

Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) is a new nosology in modern nephrology and oncohematology. MGRS is defined as kidney injury due to nephrotoxic monoclonal immunoglobulin produced by the B-cell line clone which does not reach the hematological criteria for specific treatment initiation. Monoclonal protein’s pathological effects on kidney parenchyma result in irreversible decline of kidney function till the end stage renal disease that in line with the position of International Consensus of hematologists and nephrologists determinates critical necessity for clone specific treatment in patients with MGRS despite the absence of hematological indications for treatment initiation. Main challenge of MGRS in Russian Federation is an inaccessibility of an in-time diagnostic and appropriate treatment for the great majority of patients due to the following reasons: i) limited knowledge about the MGRS among hematologists and nephrologists; ii) lack of necessary diagnostic resources in most healthcare facilities; iii) lack of approved clinical recommendations and medical economic standards for treatment of this pathological entity. Consensus document comprises the opinion of experts — leading nephrologists and hematologists of Russian Federation — on the problem of MGRS including the incoherence in nosology classification, diagnostics approach and rationale for clone specific treatment. Consensus document is based on conclusions and agreements reached during the conference of leading nephrologists and hematologists of Russia which was held in the framework of symposia «Plasma cell dyscrasias and lymphoproliferative diseases: modern approaches to therapy», 15-16 of March 2019, Pavlov First St-Petersburg State Medical University, St-Petersburg, Russia. The present Consensus is intended to define the principal practical steps to resolve the problem of MGRS in Russian Federation that are summarized as final clauses.

No abstract

Introduction.Neuroblastoma (NB) is the most common extracranial pediatric solid tumor. The high-risk group patients are characterized by adverse prognosis and require intensive complex therapy including high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT). The current study presents a single center experience of HSCT with auto-HSCT for high-risk NB performed in Raisa Gorbacheva Memorial Research Institute of Children Oncology, Hematology and Transplantation, First Pavlov State Medical University of St. Petersburg, Ministry of Health of Russia.Patients and methods.A cohort of 72 consecutive high-risk NB patients was included in the study. Among them 69 patients received Bu-Mel conditioning regimen (busulfan 16 mg/kg, melphalan 140 mg/m2 ), in 3 patients the 5D/5D regimen was used (carboplatin 1000 mg/m2 , irinotecan 150 mg/m2 , temozolomide 750 mg/m2 , etoposide 400 mg/m2 , cyclophosphamide 140 mg/kg). In most cases the autologous hematopoietic stem cells source was bone marrow (BM) (n = 59; 82 %), peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) (n = 11; 15 %), or BM and PBSC (n = 2; 3 %). In 52/66 (79 %) patients with initial bone marrow involvement the potential transplant contamination was assessed by flow cytometry.Results.The 2-year and 5-year overall (OS) and event-free (EFS) survival was 61 % and 48 %, 41 % and 35 % accordingly. The main adverse factors for OS and EFS were age of more than 18 months at diagnosis, combined bone marrow and bones involvement, MYCN amplification, initial neuron-specific enolase level of more than 100 ng/ml, primary resistance or relapse, and metaiodobenzylguanidinepositive lesions persistence prior to or after HSCT with auto-HSCT.Conclusions.The results achieved are comparable to those described for similar cohorts. Some patient subgroups are unlikely to achieve response after HSCT with auto-HSCT. Therefore, additional stratification methods and treatment modalities are needed.Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.Funding. The study was performed without external funding.