The gene expression of mTOR, autophagy-related ULK1, caspase 3, CDK-inhibitor p21, and TNF α was measured in the peripheral blood of osteoarthritic (OA) patients at different stages of the disease aiming to establish a gene expression profile that might indicate the activity of the disease and joint destruction. Whole blood of 65 OA outpatients, 27 end-stage OA patients, 27 healthy volunteers, and knee articular cartilages of 28 end-stage OA patients and 26 healthy subjects were examined. OA outpatients were subjected to clinical testing, ultrasonography, and radiographic and WOMAC scoring. Protein levels of p70-S6K, p21, and caspase 3 were quantified by ELISA. Gene expression was measured using real-time RT-PCR. Upregulation of mTOR gene expression was observed in PBMCs of 42 OA outpatients (“High mTOR expression subset”) and in PBMCs and articular cartilages of all end-stage OA patients. A positive correlation between mTOR gene expression in PBMCs and cartilage was observed in the end-stage OA patients. 23 OA outpatients in the “Low mTOR expression subset” exhibited significantly lower mTOR gene expression in PBMCs compared to healthy controls. These “Low mTOR” subset subjects experienced significantly more pain upon walking, and standing and increased total joint stiffness versus “High mTOR” subset, while the latter more often exhibited synovitis. The protein concentrations of p70-S6K, p21, and caspase 3 in PBMCs were significantly lower in the “Low” subset versus “High” subset and end-stage subjects. Increases in the expression of mTOR in PBMCs of OA patients are related to disease activity, being associated with synovitis more than with pain.

For the first time, the paper presents in detail the prevalence of osteoarthritis (OA) and considers the predictors of disease development and progression. The clinical classification of OA and its place in the ICD-10 are described. The clinical presentation of the disease is characterized in detail according to the localization of the process. It is noted that there is a change in the understanding of OA as a classic model of nociceptive pain. The paper depicts clinical, laboratory, and instrumental methods for diagnosing the disease, as well as classification and diagnostic criteria; much attention is paid to the current principles of OA therapy according to the Russian clinical recommendations and the guidelines of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO) and the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR).

Osteoarthritis (OA) pain implies an indication for joint replacement in patients with end-stage OA. However, chronic postoperative pain is observed in 10–40% of patients with OA. Here, we identified genes whose expression in the peripheral blood before surgery could denote the risk of postoperative pain development. We examined the peripheral blood of 26 healthy subjects and 50 patients with end-stage OA prior to joint replacement surgery. Pain was evaluated before surgery using the visual analog scale (VAS) index and neuropathic pain questionnaires, Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions (DN4) and PainDETECT questionnaires. Functional activity was assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC). Three and six months after surgery, pain indices according to VAS of 30% and higher were considered. Metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP)1 protein levels were measured using ELISA in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Total RNA isolated from whole blood was analysed using quantitative real-time RT-PCR for caspase-3, MMP-9, TIMP1, cathepsins K and S, tumour necrosis factor (TNF)α, interleukin (IL)-1β, and cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 gene expression. Seventeen patients reported post-surgical pain. Expression of cathepsins K and S, caspase-3, TIMP1, IL-1β, and TNFα genes before surgery was significantly higher in these patients compared to pain-free patients with OA. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses confirmed significant associations between these gene expressions and the likelihood of pain development after arthroplasty. High baseline expression of genes associated with extracellular matrix destruction (cathepsins S and K, TIMP1), inflammation (IL-1β, TNFα), and apoptosis (caspase-3) measured in the peripheral blood of patients with end-stage OA before knee arthroplasty might serve as an important biomarker of postoperative pain development.

Osteoarthritis (OA) belongs to diseases with high comorbidity and most frequently concurrent with obesity, diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension, and other cardiovascular diseases (coronary heart disease, atherosclerosis), gastrointestinal tract diseases, and chronic diseases of the lung and kidney. Irrational treatment of OA in the presence of comorbidity and without considering characteristics of drug interactions leads to a pronounced increase in the number of adverse reactions (ARs) and to aggravation of the course of all concomitant diseases. From this point of view, therapy seems to be relevant when the latter involves drugs that have both symptom- and structure-modifying properties and have a high safety profile.Objective: to compare the safety of alternating and standard treatment regimens with Alflutop® in patients with knee OA.Patients and methods. 130 patients were enrolled in the trial who had Kellgren-Lawrence Grade II–III primary tibiofemoral knee OA with pain intensity on walking ≥40 mm on a visual analogue scale and who needed to take nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (≥30 days in the previous 3 months). The patients were randomized into two groups: Group 1 was prescribed Alflutop® 1.0 ml intramuscularly (IM) daily for 20 days (a standard regimen); Group 2 was given 2 ml IM every other day (a total of 10 injections) (an alternating regimen). The duration of follow-up was 14 weeks. The safety of Alflutop® was evaluated by the incidence of ARs and serious ARs (SARs) varying in severity according to medical records, laboratory tests, physical examination, assessment of a patient' vital signs, and electrocardiography (ECG). The patients were examined at the beginning, at the end, and 1 month after therapy.Results and discussion. No SARs were recorded during the study period and follow-up. There were 10 ARs in the group of patients receiving Alflutop® in the standard regimen and 19 ARs in the other group (the alternating regimen). All ARs corresponded to mild and moderate severity, were unassociated with the test drug, and resolved by the end of the follow-up. 12-lead ECG identified only clinically insignificant abnormalities in the patients of both groups. Patients without DM displayed no clinically significant increase in glucose levels. Those with DM had no increased glycemia tendency. Biochemical studies in both groups revealed only clinically insignificant abnormalities, the frequency of which was insignificant.Conclusion. This study has confirmed the comparable high safety of Alflutop® in both standard and alternative therapy regimens. It has also shown that the drug has a good safety profile and can be recommended for wide clinical application in any use regimen: 1 ml daily (a total of 20 injections) or 2 ml every other day (a total of 10 injections).

No abstract