Introduction: The results of six randomized control trials have been published by 2022, which evaluated the efficacy of adding PD-1 inhibitors to the first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer. However, it still remains unclear which patients derive the most clinical benefit from combined therapy. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the efficacy of the combination of anti-PD1 treatment with chemotherapy in different patient subgroups.Materials and methods: We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in patients with stage IV esophageal cancer who received anti-PD1 drugs with different chemotherapeutic regimens in the first-line setting to select patients who benefit the most from the combined therapy.Results: Six randomized trials were included in the analysis for a total of 3,813 patients. Patients who received combination therapy had significantly longer OS (HR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.63-0.75; p < 0.001), PFS (HR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.56-0.69; p < 0.001), and better ORR (OR = 2.12, 95% CI: 1.85-2.42; p < 0.001) than those who received chemotherapy alone. Subgroup analyses showed no benefit of adding PD1-inhibitors to chemotherapy in patients with PD-L1 CPS <1 in terms of OS (HR = 0.58, 95 % CI: 0.31-1.1; p = 0.1) as well as in never-smokers (HR = 0.9, 95% CI: 0.67-1.23; p = 0.52).Conclusions: The addition of PD-1 inhibitors to the first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer significantly improves treatment outcomes. Our results could not strongly suggest the selected patients' cohort which would benefit the most from the combination of PD-1 inhibitors and chemotherapy use.
The generally accepted standard in early breast cancer surgery today is breast-conserving surgery with external beam radiation therapy, which is comparable in results to previously widely performed radical mastectomy and even has an advantage in terms of overall survival and control. Until now, there are areas of discussion and a number of questions remain related to the methodology of irradiation of patients with breast cancer, namely: is it advisable to irradiate the axillary zone after radical resection for early breast cancer? Does irradiation of axillary lymph nodes provide regional control comparable to lymphadenectomy, and whether it can be an alternative to lymph node dissection? Whether provides an irradiation of axillary lymph nodes comparable with regional lymph node dissection the control over patients with a positive sentry lymph node? A lot of studies have been published so far, answers to questions derived from what we present in this work.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.