Ukraine currently needs additional investment resources in order to revitalize and develop the economy. The main objective of the study is to determine the regularities, peculiarities behind the formation of organized population’s savings and assess the factors influencing the development of this market in order to improve the quality of its management and use of the potential of domestic investment resources for economic recovery and growth in Ukraine. In order to compare the trends as for the accumulation of savings through deposit investment, the authors analyzed the impact of major factors on these processes in Ukraine and Czech Republic. The main results of the study encompass improved approaches to determining the impact of the system of factors on household deposits based on correlation-regression analysis. This makes it possible to optimize the choice of tools for effective management of deposit resources; further elaborate the approaches to assessing the level of domestic household deposits as well as allows substantiating the directions of implementation of the state policy in the context of ensuring the further development on the market of bank deposit services.
The authors classify and investigate the losses caused by the military conflict in the east of Ukraine and the annexation of Crimea, as well as the approaches to their assessment. The authors studied the results of scientific research, current legislation, and information-analytical materials and came to the conclusion that there are no common standards (approaches) or detailed approaches to loss assessment for different entities (state, individual enterprises, and citizens), and the mechanism of compensation for losses is undeveloped as well. This can cause many problems both for experts in substantiating the volume of damages and for courts in considering relevant cases for losses. The authors considered the damage caused to Ukraine by the military conflict with Russia, which resulted in the annexation of the Crimean peninsula and the occupation of Luhansk and Donetsk regions, and interpreted this damage as assessed consequences of these events and classified them by place and time of manifestation on direct, indirect, complete and general, and by spheres of manifestation of consequences on medico-biological, military-political, socio-economic, external and internal political and ecological ones. To characterize each of these types of damage, the authors have identified certain components that can have quantitative and qualitative forms of expression. Taken into account that the qualitative assessment of the consequences of armed conflict is subjective to some extent and depends on the coverage of expert opinions, the authors focused on those components that can be quantified (in monetary terms). To assess them, in the article there were formed certain groups of indicators that have a quantitative form of expression. At the same time, first of all, the authors take into account indicators that make it possible to assess the direct damage from the armed conflict. The authors, based on the analysis and generalization of the values of these indicators in the dynamics, determine the estimated amount of direct damage caused to Ukraine during the conflict (2014-2019), and give a forecast of its growth if this conflict continues. Also, we propose the option of calculating the lost benefit from the impossibility of using a part of the country’s territory (currently uncontrolled) based on its potential.
The article is devoted to peculiarities of managing the turnover assets within accounts receivable and payable of an enterprise, and substantiation of approaches to defining their optimum correlation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.