1997
DOI: 10.1023/a:1018536603243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More details about this method have been presented elsewhere. 21) Young's modulus of the sample has been determined by a simple axial traction test. A Poisson ratio of 0.33 has been assumed.…”
Section: Experimental Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More details about this method have been presented elsewhere. 21) Young's modulus of the sample has been determined by a simple axial traction test. A Poisson ratio of 0.33 has been assumed.…”
Section: Experimental Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the methods we consider are infinite series solution. This exact solution can already be (1) the layer-removal method; [21][22][23][24] (2) the hole-drilling found in some standard texts such as Reference 18. method; [25][26][27][28][29] and (3) the crack-compliance method. [30][31][32][33][34][35] Instead, Indenbom has only taken the first eigenfunction,…”
Section: Indenbom's Instant-freezing Theory For Infinite Plate Gementioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,53 The compressive stress will induce an out-of-plane anisotropy K u2 , while the tensile stress will induce an in-plane anisotropy. 54,55 According to the work of Tejedor et al, 56 the ribbon is mainly under the compressive stress if the ribbon's thickness is less than 20 µm, which is the same as our ribbon thickness. Hence, we consider our ribbon is mainly under compressive stress, and the stress induced magnetism moments in bulk part are almost perpendicular to the ribbon surface.…”
Section: B Magnetic Anisotropy In Amorphous Ribbonsmentioning
confidence: 52%