2016 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/isscc.2016.7418041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

19.4 A 0.17-to-3.5mW 0.15-to-5GHz SoC PLL with 15dB built-in supply noise rejection and self-bandwidth control in 14nm CMOS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 33X better energy-efficiency warrants for a practical implementation which would be a future extension of this work. Our work achieves a better pJ/cycle number because of (1) no additional spur-cancelation circuit (for narrowband applications such as [22]) is required because the PLL output for a BB-BAN will not be subjected to mixing and its nonidealities, (2) no active circuit for adaptive BW control (as no real-time self-adjustment is needed for BB-BAN) and no integral/proportional charge pump as in [10], [20] and [21] is employed, (3) VCO and LDO, which are two of the most power-intensive components in a PLL, are optimized for a low (f/fT) application, (4) no replica-feedback (as in [9]) and no additional noise cancellation circuit (as in [19]) is needed as LDO provides -50dB PSNR for the frequency of operation. The wide tuning range is achieved because of the scalable VCO and adjustable loop BW.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 33X better energy-efficiency warrants for a practical implementation which would be a future extension of this work. Our work achieves a better pJ/cycle number because of (1) no additional spur-cancelation circuit (for narrowband applications such as [22]) is required because the PLL output for a BB-BAN will not be subjected to mixing and its nonidealities, (2) no active circuit for adaptive BW control (as no real-time self-adjustment is needed for BB-BAN) and no integral/proportional charge pump as in [10], [20] and [21] is employed, (3) VCO and LDO, which are two of the most power-intensive components in a PLL, are optimized for a low (f/fT) application, (4) no replica-feedback (as in [9]) and no additional noise cancellation circuit (as in [19]) is needed as LDO provides -50dB PSNR for the frequency of operation. The wide tuning range is achieved because of the scalable VCO and adjustable loop BW.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, passive filters are inserted between the current copy transistors, so the thermal and flicker noise from the bias generating transistors can be suppressed. In addition, C LF helps improve power supply rejection ratio (PSRR) [19].…”
Section: Digitally Controlled Oscillatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PLL based on self-biased techniques is attractive for solving these problems [11][12][13][14][15]. The self-biased PLL has the following advantages:…”
Section: Of 15mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many self-biased PLLs [11][12][13] whose loop bandwidth cannot track the division ratio have removed the division ratio effect, and the bandwidth is unchanged when the reference clock is stable. The low-pass filter (LPF) is a key module in PLL.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation