2020
DOI: 10.1080/1523908x.2020.1816937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

21 years of research for the twenty-first century: revisiting the journal of environmental policy and planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whatever the focus of governance analysis, discourses, as the visible expressions of power/knowledge configurations, always play a pivotal role in governance and hence in the understanding of change in governance [44]. The body of literature that explicitly analyses the importance of discourses is relatively small [18,45]. Additionally, the linkages with other approaches that, for example, focus on institutions or actors, are rather weak.…”
Section: Key Drivers Of Change Are Discursive Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whatever the focus of governance analysis, discourses, as the visible expressions of power/knowledge configurations, always play a pivotal role in governance and hence in the understanding of change in governance [44]. The body of literature that explicitly analyses the importance of discourses is relatively small [18,45]. Additionally, the linkages with other approaches that, for example, focus on institutions or actors, are rather weak.…”
Section: Key Drivers Of Change Are Discursive Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emphasis on sustainability transformations and the related processes of learning, innovation, and adaptation has inspired a growing interest in theories that help to grasp the processes of change in governance [12][13][14][15]. Yet, various authors argue that the literature on change in environmental governance and, more specifically, on sustainability transitions is rather fragmented, and hence that there is a dire need for the further integration of different insights and knowledge [16][17][18]. At the same time, one should recognize that knowledge integration concerning governance and sustainability transitions will always be partial because of different ontological and epistemological assumptions, diverging points of departure and focus, and because the literature puts forward a myriad of descriptive and normative perspectives that simply cannot be brought together in a unified theory that captures all aspects of governance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Environmental policy has been an appealing topic for practitioners and academics in the last decade [12]. Environmental policy research is multidisciplinary, including agenda settings for implementation and evaluation [13]. Environmental policy often contradicts adherents of a country's economic growth, which causes environmental sustainability to be often ruled out.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%