2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-011-1752-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

25-, 23-, and 20-gauge vitrectomy in epiretinal membrane surgery: a comparative study of 553 cases

Abstract: In ERM surgery, 23-G and 25-G (MIVS) systems are as safe and effective as the 20-G system, and significantly reduce surgical time. Although the 25-G system provides an earlier visual improvement, the 23- and 25- gauge systems are comparable, and the selection will depend on the surgeon's preference.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
58
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The issue of compromised wound integrity due to the lack of sutures possibly leading to complications such as hypotony, endophthalmitis and choroidal hemorrhage has been a matter of discussion [1]. However, one other important difference between the sutureless and the conventional techniques are the microcannula-guided entry sites into the eye [2,3,4,5,6,7]. Even though vitreous incarceration to the microcannulas has been documented, the microcannula system has been proposed to lower the risk of retinal dragging (with formation of iatrogenic retinal defects) during vitrectomy [3,4,5,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue of compromised wound integrity due to the lack of sutures possibly leading to complications such as hypotony, endophthalmitis and choroidal hemorrhage has been a matter of discussion [1]. However, one other important difference between the sutureless and the conventional techniques are the microcannula-guided entry sites into the eye [2,3,4,5,6,7]. Even though vitreous incarceration to the microcannulas has been documented, the microcannula system has been proposed to lower the risk of retinal dragging (with formation of iatrogenic retinal defects) during vitrectomy [3,4,5,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The longer duration of vitreous extraction through the smaller-caliber instrument is obviously more than outweighed by technical simplification with a net shortening of procedural time by about 10%. Whereas some authors describe a shorter operation time for 23-7,11,12 and 25-gauge ppv, 5,7,12 respectively, others find no difference. 13,14 When comparing operation times, the exact procedure and its respective time requirement must be considered; for instance, a longer duration of the actual vitreous extraction that outweighs the benefit of the non-suture may be a result of a lower cutting rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…6,11,12,23 All in all, single-session 23-gauge ppv with b-MICS yields excellent results equivalent to those of conventional twostep procedures in the treatment of macular hole with cataract.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…1,3,6,12,13 On the other hand, an IPVD is thought to be an important etiology when the breaks are located in the inferior quadrants. 2,3,5 Two of three (66.7%) retinal breaks in the PPH group were identified in the superior quadrants, near the sclerotomy sites, suggesting the etiology of these breaks could be sclerotomy-related rather than IPVD-related.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…1,[3][4][5] However, a fundamental strategy to prevent the development of iatrogenic retinal breaks related to an IPVD has not yet been established. Some investigators have recommended a careful intraoperative and postoperative peripheral examination at the end of each vitrectomy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%