2016
DOI: 10.17736/ijope.2016.ak09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2D Numerical ISPH Wave Tank for Complex Fluid–Structure Coupling Problems

Abstract: In this paper, we provide a hybrid incompressible Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (ISPH) model for fluid-structure interactions. The numerical algorithms include the mirroring treatment of solid boundary, free surface tracking, wave damping using sponge layer and fluidsolid coupling model. The proposed ISPH wave tank is applied to a series of wave-structure coupling problems including the sloshing in a baffled tank, solitary wave impact on an underwater obstacle, water entry of a cylinder and balance dynamics … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The middle-filling-level sloshing in different tanks under different excitations has been the topic of numerous researches. A large portion of these studies focused on the sloshing in rectangular tanks under single-degree-of-freedom (longitudinal) translational (Koh et al, 2012;Liu and Zhang, 2019;Liu et al, 2016;Lu et al, 2018;Meng et al, 2020;Pal and Bhattacharyya, 2010;Xue et al, 2017;Xue and Lin, 2011;Zheng et al, 2017) and rotational (Bulian et al, 2014;Chen et al, 2013;Delorme et al, 2009;Souto-Iglesias et al, 2015) excitations. In these cases, the simplification of two-dimensional (2D) waves gives satisfactory predictions of the sloshing wave profile and pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The middle-filling-level sloshing in different tanks under different excitations has been the topic of numerous researches. A large portion of these studies focused on the sloshing in rectangular tanks under single-degree-of-freedom (longitudinal) translational (Koh et al, 2012;Liu and Zhang, 2019;Liu et al, 2016;Lu et al, 2018;Meng et al, 2020;Pal and Bhattacharyya, 2010;Xue et al, 2017;Xue and Lin, 2011;Zheng et al, 2017) and rotational (Bulian et al, 2014;Chen et al, 2013;Delorme et al, 2009;Souto-Iglesias et al, 2015) excitations. In these cases, the simplification of two-dimensional (2D) waves gives satisfactory predictions of the sloshing wave profile and pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since Monaghan [8] pioneered the first simulation of a simple dam break problem using SPH, it has been successfully applied to fluid mechanics problems such as wave overtopping [9,10] and wave slamming [11,12]. Later it has been extended to solve fluid-structure interaction problems including wave interactions with caisson breakwaters [13,14], with floating bodies [15][16][17][18] and with porous structures [19][20][21][22] as well as wave interactions with mound breakwater protected by armour blocks being discretized using SPH particles [23,24]. Nevertheless, the studies mentioned above have all focused on two dimensional applications of SPH and few researches are confronting 3D problems due to the high computational cost of 3D SPH models except some applications concerned with dam break [25][26][27] and wave breaking [23,28,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%