2004
DOI: 10.1075/pbns.123.07ahe
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3. The Spanish subjunctive: Procedural semantics and pragmatic inference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This proposal goes very much in the same line of some research carried out in RT over the last decade, which places emphasis on the nature of explicit communication (see, for instance, Carston, 2002;Wilson, 2004;Wilson and Sperber, 2000). Among the RT analyses of different linguistic units that contribute to higher-level explicatures we find studies on conceptual units such as true parentheticals (Ifantidou-Trouki, 1994), illocutionary and attitudinal sentential adverbials (Ifantidou-Trouki, 1994;Wilson, 1998) and reformulation markers (Blakemore, 1996), in addition to procedural units such as intonation (Escandell Vidal, 1998), mood (Rouchota, 1994;Papafragou, 2000;Ahern, 2004Ahern, , 2005Ahern, , 2006Ahern and Leonetti, 2004) and particles such as ? eh?…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This proposal goes very much in the same line of some research carried out in RT over the last decade, which places emphasis on the nature of explicit communication (see, for instance, Carston, 2002;Wilson, 2004;Wilson and Sperber, 2000). Among the RT analyses of different linguistic units that contribute to higher-level explicatures we find studies on conceptual units such as true parentheticals (Ifantidou-Trouki, 1994), illocutionary and attitudinal sentential adverbials (Ifantidou-Trouki, 1994;Wilson, 1998) and reformulation markers (Blakemore, 1996), in addition to procedural units such as intonation (Escandell Vidal, 1998), mood (Rouchota, 1994;Papafragou, 2000;Ahern, 2004Ahern, , 2005Ahern, , 2006Ahern and Leonetti, 2004) and particles such as ? eh?…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…27 For instance, a more recent version of the non-assertion hypothesis can be seen in Ahern and Leonetti (2004) who, based on Mejías-Bikandi (1994), relate (non-) assertion to an individual's point of view, though not necessarily the speaker's. It has been often argued that irrealis and subjunctive are not the same, since many clauses containing subjunctives do not express "irreality" (see de Haan 2012 for a recent discussion).…”
Section: On Verbs Nominal Predicates and Negationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Partikkelen da koder ikke et begrepsinnhold, det har i stedet en prosedural semantikk («procedural semantics»). At et språklig uttrykk har en prosedural semantikk (for litteratur om dette, se Blakemore 1987Blakemore , 2002Wilson 2011Wilson , 2016Wilson & Sperber 1993;Escandell-Vidal & al 2011;Hall 2007;Ahern & Leonetti 2004;Fretheim 2000Fretheim , 2011Fretheim , 2014Fretheim , 2015aFretheim , 2015bFretheim , 2017aFretheim , 2017bFretheim , 2018Fretheim , 2019, betyr at uttrykket instruerer adressaten om hvordan det bør trekkes kontekstdrevne slutninger for å oppnå en tolkning av ytringen som gir optimal relevans, altså mest mulig kognitiv effekt for minst mulig prosesseringskostnad (Sperber & Wilson 1986/1995; se min fotnote 3).…”
Section: Innledningunclassified