2008
DOI: 10.1109/icpr.2008.4761696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D face recognition using the Surface Interpenetration Measure: A comparative evaluation on the FRGC database

Abstract: This paper focuses a comparative evaluation of our framework for 3D face recognition and state-of-theart systems. Our method uses a Simulated Annealingbased approach (SA) for range image registration with the Surface Interpenetration Measure (SIM) as the similarity measure, in order to match two face images. The authentication score is obtained by combining the SIM values corresponding to the matching of four different face regions. Experiments were performed on the FRGC v2 database simulating both verificatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Six parameters are required for simulated annealing (in which three for every translation also the rotation referencing to a 3D coordinate system) which is used to define transformation matrix which is used for an alignment between two 3D faces. is approach aligns images of the face in three phases: (1) alignment in initial level, (2) alignment in an approximate level, and (3) alignment in the last level [14]. Initially, the center of the two-sided mass is being aligned.…”
Section: Simulated Annealing-based Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six parameters are required for simulated annealing (in which three for every translation also the rotation referencing to a 3D coordinate system) which is used to define transformation matrix which is used for an alignment between two 3D faces. is approach aligns images of the face in three phases: (1) alignment in initial level, (2) alignment in an approximate level, and (3) alignment in the last level [14]. Initially, the center of the two-sided mass is being aligned.…”
Section: Simulated Annealing-based Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A single alignment event required for a probe to align it to ICS makes this technique appropriate for identification as well as verification scenarios [15]. SA [32] algorithm employs a stochastic technique using a local search based approach and its drawback is excessive time consumption [33]. Similar to ICP, this method is suitable for verification setup only.…”
Section: D Face Alignment Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In alignment phase, facial features are transformed such that they can be reliably matched. A few 3D alignment techniques [29][30][31][32][33][34] existing in literature are based on Iterative Closest Point (ICP) [30], Intrinsic Coordinate System (ICS) [31], Simulated Annealing (SA) [32], and Average Face Model (AFM) [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IMAGO Research Group has started developing a 3D face recognition system in 2005. Since then several works were published by our group presenting different components of a 3D face recognition system, such as face reconstruction [9], face localization [8], face segmentation [10], [15], facial landmarks detection [10], [15], face matching [11], [14], [16]- [18] and matching evaluation [12], [13].…”
Section: B 3d Face Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, feature points were employed to extract some rigid regions of the face which are less affected by expressions, as shown in Figure 7. The matching of multiple facial regions is performed in hierarchical manner [11]- [14], [16] to obtain faster and more accurate face verification results. Our group is working on 3D face recognition solutions in more difficult scenarios, such as real-time systems, recognition at distance and complex backgrounds.…”
Section: B 3d Face Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%