2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2018.01.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D gaze estimation without explicit personal calibration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The research on the regression-based method mainly concentrates on improving the precision and simplifying the steps of personal calibration. Regression-based methods can be divided into two categories [18]: feature-based methods and appearance-based methods. Feature-based methods establish mappings between eye features and eye directions, such as pupils, reflective spots, and so on [19,20].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research on the regression-based method mainly concentrates on improving the precision and simplifying the steps of personal calibration. Regression-based methods can be divided into two categories [18]: feature-based methods and appearance-based methods. Feature-based methods establish mappings between eye features and eye directions, such as pupils, reflective spots, and so on [19,20].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Categories System configuration Head movement Accuracy/ • Special features [1] Appearance-based 1 0 2.37±1.42 Using eye appearance [24] ICT-based 1 0 × X:0.99,Y:1.33 Polynomial function between iris-corner and PoR [5] ICCR-based 1 1 × 0.75 Polynomial function between iris-glint and PoR [25] CR-based 1 5 0.70 Using a dynamic tangent plane [6] HN-based 1 4 × 1.03-1.17 One point calibration [26] 3D model-based 1 0 X:3.0,Y:4.5 Using an RGB-D camera(Kinect) [27] 3D model-based 1 4 1.3 Without explicit personal calibration [28] 3D model-based 2 2 1.18 Using glint and contour features [11] 3D model-based 2 3 1 A linear solution for LoS estimation Our 3D model-based 1 2 X:1.17,Y:1.17 Typical OCTLS system on the OA of the eyeball. When the cornea radius deviates from the true value by 0.5 mm, the OA error is still less than 0.1 • .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some methods use not only a pure saliency maps but utilize also natural constraints like center bias that assumes that gaze locations are biased towards the center of the scene during free viewing [19,20].…”
Section: The State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%