2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.icte.2018.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D moving target tracking with measurement fusion of TDoA/FDoA/AoA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…M-step: µ ← µ + 1 12: end while filter based on the AoA estimation [35]- [37]. These attempts deal mainly with simulation results and do not involve a specific application.…”
Section: Particle Filter Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M-step: µ ← µ + 1 12: end while filter based on the AoA estimation [35]- [37]. These attempts deal mainly with simulation results and do not involve a specific application.…”
Section: Particle Filter Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, RSS-based and ToA-based methods require knowledge about the transmit power and the transmit time used by the target AV, which are not available in the case of a spoofing target [13]. Such knowledge is not necessary for TDoA-based methods, making it a favorable choice for MLAT with CWN [10,19]. In [19], Seo et al proposed a particle filter-based 3D target tracking algorithm with measurement fusion of TDoA, frequency difference of arrival (FDoA), and angle of arrival (AoA).…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the figure illustrates CRLB varies from sub-meter values near the edge closest to the sensor network, to more than two meters near the two farthermost vertices to the sensor network. Although in this simulation we suppose that signal-to-noiseratio (SN R) is 20dB, much higher SNRs is accessible due to the independency of noise in antennas pairs that results in the cancellation of noise terms in (9). Assuming identical SNR at input antennas, CRLB illustrated in Figure 4 is very close in shape and values to CRLB of the same sensor network that utilizes directional antennas with 0.02 o in standard deviation of directional of arrival (DOA) estimation error [31], [32].…”
Section: Cramer-rao Lower Bound Of Error (Crlb)mentioning
confidence: 99%