2017
DOI: 10.1080/19386362.2017.1368139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D numerical analysis of piled raft foundation in stone column improved soft soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 7 indicates the proportion of load carried by the central, inner, edge, and corner individual piles. Before wall rotation, the corner pile carried the highest pile head load compared to the central pile, which is in tandem with previous studies [12,14,50]. However, at the final rotation of the wall, the pile head load computed for shorter piles close to the wall became relatively larger and increased at a higher rate than the others while the increment for the long pile head load increased with increasing the wall rotation to a certain amount, e.g., 20-25 × 10 −4 rad, and then due to pilepile interaction effect, it afterward started decreasing with the corner pile (pile A) attaining a 4% increment but the edge (pile C) 1% decrement at the end of wall rotation as compared to their initial values.…”
Section: Effect Of Number Of Pilessupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 7 indicates the proportion of load carried by the central, inner, edge, and corner individual piles. Before wall rotation, the corner pile carried the highest pile head load compared to the central pile, which is in tandem with previous studies [12,14,50]. However, at the final rotation of the wall, the pile head load computed for shorter piles close to the wall became relatively larger and increased at a higher rate than the others while the increment for the long pile head load increased with increasing the wall rotation to a certain amount, e.g., 20-25 × 10 −4 rad, and then due to pilepile interaction effect, it afterward started decreasing with the corner pile (pile A) attaining a 4% increment but the edge (pile C) 1% decrement at the end of wall rotation as compared to their initial values.…”
Section: Effect Of Number Of Pilessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Beyond the spacing of 8 times the pile diameter, the group effect and arching would not be felt, and the failure mode of the soil surrounding the piles would be the same as that of a single pile [48]. In composite pile foundation, pile spacing directly reflects one of the basic load sharing parameters, the pile area replacement ratio, m. Apart from changing the spacing, the area replacement ratio can also be varied by increasing the diameter of the pile (or its head) [50,52,53] and/or provision of pile cap [54,55]. From the mechanical characteristics of CFG pile composite foundation, it is well known that the smaller the clearance between neighbouring piles, the larger the cover ratio of piles and the smaller the load sharing proportion of the soil, meanwhile reducing the foundation settlement.…”
Section: Effect Of Pile Spacingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model comprised structural (pile, raft and wall) and geotechnical (soil and cushion) parts that were modelled as elastic and elastic ideal plastic Mohr-Coulomb constitutive model, respectively. Even though Mohr-Coulomb model is not a state-of-the-art constitutive relation, it has widely been employed in FE analysis to describe the engineering characteristics of geotechnical materials while investigating the behaviour of composite piled raft foundations [6,10,[43][44][45] and performance of deep foundation pit excavations and/or their influence on the surrounding infrastructures. [26,46,47] Figure 1 depicts the typical meshed geometry employed in the model.…”
Section: Methodology Of Analysis 21 Finite Element Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Short piles can be selected from rigid piles, semirigid piles, or flexible piles and are mainly used to improve the bearing capacity of composite foundations [15]. is is similar to the concepts of composite piled raft foundation and multielement composite foundations proposed by scholars [16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…e results revealed multielement composite foundations (such as a combination of steel pipe pile and sand column or a combination of concrete pile and lime column) have a higher bearing capacity than the composite foundation with only sand columns with the same conditions. rough three-dimensional finite element software, Samanta and Bhowmik [19,20] studied the efficacy of improving the soft soil by stone columns on the response of a piled raft foundation. Studies showed that reinforcing the shallow soft soil with stone columns can effectively improve the bearing interaction of the raft.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%