2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.0c00789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D-Printed Labware for High-Throughput Immobilization of Enzymes

Abstract: In continuous flow biocatalysis, chemical transformations can occur under milder, greener, more scalable, and safer conditions than conventional organic synthesis. However, the method typically involves extensive screening to optimize each enzyme's immobilization on its solid support material. The task of weighing solids for large numbers of experiments poses a bottleneck for screening enzyme immobilization conditions. For example, screening conditions often require multiple replicates exploring different supp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scope of this review focused only on studies that directly immobilized enzymes on or in the 3D printed objects and does not include many other innovations that use 3D printing to make customizable tools and devices, such as labware [ 88 ], mass spectrometry microcolumns [ 89 ], and biomedical devices [ 90 ], where enzymes are not directly included. The review emphasized the most recent techniques and chemistry for achieving successful enzyme immobilization by 3D printing, especially by gelation mechanisms that favor high retention of enzyme activity and longevity; however, the reader is referred elsewhere for more information on the basic physics of mass transfer limitations that may occur in these systems and how they are currently being studied through modeling [ 85 ].…”
Section: Limitation Of the Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scope of this review focused only on studies that directly immobilized enzymes on or in the 3D printed objects and does not include many other innovations that use 3D printing to make customizable tools and devices, such as labware [ 88 ], mass spectrometry microcolumns [ 89 ], and biomedical devices [ 90 ], where enzymes are not directly included. The review emphasized the most recent techniques and chemistry for achieving successful enzyme immobilization by 3D printing, especially by gelation mechanisms that favor high retention of enzyme activity and longevity; however, the reader is referred elsewhere for more information on the basic physics of mass transfer limitations that may occur in these systems and how they are currently being studied through modeling [ 85 ].…”
Section: Limitation Of the Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Membrane reactors such as the tube-in-tube device, which is used for biotransformations that involve gaseous reagents, are another type of mesoreactor [80,81]. More recently, 3D-printed continuous flow reactors have also begun to be applied to biocatalysis to create customizable bioreactors [82][83][84][85]. The characteristics of the abovementioned flow bioreactors have been extensively reviewed recently [34,36,39].…”
Section: Fundamentals Of Flow Biocatalysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the bioreactor performances were tested only in the oxidation of the artificial chemical mediator ABTS [2,20-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)] and not in other target reactions of synthetic interest. In another very recent example, laccases were included in a study of 3D-printed continuous flow bioreactors [42]. Unfortunately, when compared to other types of enzymes, e.g., alkaline phosphatase and glucose dehydrogenase, the results obtained with laccases showed very high levels of experimental error that hampered a definitive evaluation of this flow system.…”
Section: Laccases Catalytic Cycle and Their Use In Non-conventional Reaction Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%