2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2019.100974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D printing of bio-based polycarbonate and its potential applications in ecofriendly indoor manufacturing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, FDM is one of the most often-used AM technologies. Usually, polymer materials such as polylactic acid (PLA) [13,14], acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) [15], and polycarbonate (PC) [16] are used with this technology. Constantly increasing requirements for produced parts in every field of industry ask for better mechanical properties and lower mass of the parts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, FDM is one of the most often-used AM technologies. Usually, polymer materials such as polylactic acid (PLA) [13,14], acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) [15], and polycarbonate (PC) [16] are used with this technology. Constantly increasing requirements for produced parts in every field of industry ask for better mechanical properties and lower mass of the parts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Properties of 3D-printed parts are dependent on both their material structure and printing process, and therefore require extensive testing of combinations of materials/process parameters to determine material capabilities for a given application [ 33 ]. For instance, a part’s mechanical response when fabricated with fused deposition modeling is alterable based on the printed layer thickness, processing temperature, and orientation [ 34 , 35 ]. In Table 1 a summary is provided that highlights the measured mechanical properties of some common polymer 3D-printed materials tested as solid samples; additional notes in the table provide context for how testing was carried out to provide ranges of process-dependent properties.…”
Section: Materials Capabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Table 1 , multiple studies are reported for comparisons of ABS materials that all demonstrated similar, but slightly different mechanical properties [ 34 , 35 , 36 ], such as tensile strength ranging from 15 MPa to 38 MPa. These differences are accounted for in part because of the different processing temperatures and printing parameters used to construct parts, the slightly different proportions of monomers in ABS’s structure, and the tested part’s orientation.…”
Section: Materials Capabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the traditional singleobjective topology optimization design, multiobjective optimization is more suitable for engineering practice since it considers both static and dynamic design objectives. e most widely used casting method for the optimized joint is additive manufacturing [30], which greatly reduces the time and labor cost through the layer-by-layer stacking of materials. e principle of the printing process is as follows:…”
Section: Comparison Of Mechanical Performancementioning
confidence: 99%