2015
DOI: 10.1089/3dp.2015.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D Printing of Personalized Artificial Bone Scaffolds

Abstract: Additive manufacturing technologies, including three -dimensional printing (3DP),

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
87
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, it is also possible to produce complex shapes with the 3D nanofiber aerogels capable of fitting bone defects using a mold generated by 3D printing technique based on the 3D imaging of bone defects. [35] However, the 3D hybrid aerogels may need further toughening in order to applied for tissue engineering of load bearing long bones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, it is also possible to produce complex shapes with the 3D nanofiber aerogels capable of fitting bone defects using a mold generated by 3D printing technique based on the 3D imaging of bone defects. [35] However, the 3D hybrid aerogels may need further toughening in order to applied for tissue engineering of load bearing long bones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an outstanding example, fracture, nonunion and infection are some complicated drawbacks of more than 30% of the allograft procedures and also requiring high volume of bone in autograft method (DE LONG et al, 2007;Doyle et al, 2015). Therefore, researchers have gone toward preparation of suitable structural frameworks named bone scaffold to provide a support for cells (Jariwala et al, 2015;Poh, 2014). Such structures should have appropriate geometrical and mechanical properties in order to provide suitable bone treatment (Giannitelli et al, 2014;Sanz-Herrera et al, 2008;Yang et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, for the first time, we have attempted to draw knowledge from different spheres of cell engineering (like nonviral gene delivery; Olton et al, ; Santos et al, ) with the purpose of coaxing the scientific community towards merging these advanced techniques with bone bioprinting. Historical progress of this field was heavily dependent upon cell‐free printing using hard bone‐like materials like ceramics (HA/β‐tricalcium phosphate), bioglass‐ceramic composites and polymers (PCL), which will not be discussed here as many good reviews have already covered those aspects (Bose, Vahabzadeh, & Bandyopadhyay, ; Jariwala et al, ; Li, Chen, Fan, & Zhou, ; Wen et al, ). A major limitation is that such ceramic‐based scaffolds (some of which have been listed in Figure ) require post‐fabrication processing such as high temperature sintering or dissolution in organic solvents (Almela et al, ; Roohani‐Esfahani, Newman, & Zreiqat, ) to confer stability on constructs and hence do not support live‐cell printing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%