2017
DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2016.2600502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D Statistical Shape Models Incorporating Landmark-Wise Random Regression Forests for Omni-Directional Landmark Detection

Abstract: 3D Statistical Shape Models (3D-SSM) are widely used for medical image segmentation. However, during segmentation, they typically perform a very limited unidirectional search for suitable landmark positions in the image, relying on weak learners or use-case specific appearance models that solely take local image information into account. As a consequence, segmentation errors arise, and results in general depend on the accuracy of a previous model initialization. Furthermore, these methods become subject to a t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the segmentation methods based on the deformation model, statistical shape model and probabilistic atlas model have been widely used in the field of liver segmentation and tested to be effective, the following problems remain to be addressed [ 3 ]. (i) In the deformation model, the validity and robustness of the internal and external force constraint models must be improved.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the segmentation methods based on the deformation model, statistical shape model and probabilistic atlas model have been widely used in the field of liver segmentation and tested to be effective, the following problems remain to be addressed [ 3 ]. (i) In the deformation model, the validity and robustness of the internal and external force constraint models must be improved.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it must be said that, over the past years, many different computational techniques have been described for organ segmentation. 26 This may raise the question, "Why use IVIM data sets for tissue type classification and segmentation?" Because most segmentation techniques are based on surface and landmark detection and typically not relying on organ characteristics except for their shape, these algorithms may run into serious problems for classification, if the anatomy of the organs is severely changed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning–based methods have been developed for automated analysis of the majority of OARs that may be involved in liver SBRT. Because of the availability of a public database and unified evaluation software, liver segmentation has been receiving considerable attention in the literature [ 100 , 101 , 103 110 ]. The existing machine learning–based methods exhibit liver segmentation accuracy of from 67 to 97.3%, measured in terms of Dice coefficient, and ~5% of volume disagreement from that obtained with manual segmentation [ 107 , 108 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%