2012
DOI: 10.4017/gt.2012.11.02.181.00
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

4D and Tablet PC for progress reporting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[46]. Classical methods of visualization, such as Gantt charts, lack the ability to illustrate the relationships between time and space [48]. With the help of this feature, more understandable and practical results are obtained, and it ensures that the problems that may be encountered can be foreseen, and the necessary precautions are taken in advance [48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[46]. Classical methods of visualization, such as Gantt charts, lack the ability to illustrate the relationships between time and space [48]. With the help of this feature, more understandable and practical results are obtained, and it ensures that the problems that may be encountered can be foreseen, and the necessary precautions are taken in advance [48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The WBS code used in the study follows recommendations from previous studies, including Ciribini et al (2016), Hamledari et al (2017) and Altun and Akcamete (2019), for the creation of a consistent coding system between activities and BIM elements through an exact match. This choice differs from Montaser and Moselhi (2015), Cheng et al (2017) and Torres-Calderon et al (2019), which used a linguistic-based matching rule. The link code inserted into model elements is often not specified, such as in the study of Ciribini et al (2016).…”
Section: Contribution Of the Automation To The Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "Activity ID" parameter was used and not detailed. Montaser and Moselhi's (2015) study still requires a manual effort to create the group elements in Revit, which would be the grouping of elements linked to a work package in the MS Project TM . In this regard, the present study advances with the automation of coding the model elements, using native Revit parameters to associate the location and the work package executed.…”
Section: Contribution Of the Automation To The Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation