2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2007.01.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

500Hz logon versus click ABR maturation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the frequency of 500 Hz, the mean latency found at 80 dBnHL was of 8.53±0.17 ms, and at 30 dBnHL, of 13.73±0.57 ms. Only one study assessed latency at 80 dBnHL 34 , and the mean latency of wave V found was longer than in the present study (Full-term children: 11.0±0.7 ms; preterm children: 12.1±0.3 ms). At the intensity of 30 dBnHL, some studies have found mean latencies similar to those in the present study 18,20,35 . In the frequency of 1000 Hz, at 80 dBnHL, the latency time was 8.61±0.38 ms, shorter than the results of another study conducted in Brazil frequency suggest responses at intensities lower than 20 dBnHL 10,14,[19][20][21][22] .…”
Section: Function Latency X Intensitysupporting
confidence: 88%
“…For the frequency of 500 Hz, the mean latency found at 80 dBnHL was of 8.53±0.17 ms, and at 30 dBnHL, of 13.73±0.57 ms. Only one study assessed latency at 80 dBnHL 34 , and the mean latency of wave V found was longer than in the present study (Full-term children: 11.0±0.7 ms; preterm children: 12.1±0.3 ms). At the intensity of 30 dBnHL, some studies have found mean latencies similar to those in the present study 18,20,35 . In the frequency of 1000 Hz, at 80 dBnHL, the latency time was 8.61±0.38 ms, shorter than the results of another study conducted in Brazil frequency suggest responses at intensities lower than 20 dBnHL 10,14,[19][20][21][22] .…”
Section: Function Latency X Intensitysupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In infants beyond the neonatal period, Kulekci et al (2007) provided age-specific norms for 500 Hz AC-TBABR and click ABR for ages from newborn (39 to 40 weeks) to 2 to 4 yr. For 500 Hz, mean latencies of 11.13 (Ϯ1.30) for 55 dB nHL and 13.16 (Ϯ1.23) were obtained from 12 infants in the age range of 2 to 4 mo, which compares well with the data in the current study (compare with Table 3 and Fig. 3).…”
Section: Abr Latency Data In Infantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample of the research was seventy-seven infants and children ranging from conceptional age of 40 weeks (term babies) to 4 years were tested with both click and tonal ABR without any risk factors for hearing loss. Külekçi, et al, (2007)'s results indicate that five hundred hertz of tonal ABR wave V latency did not mature until to 2-4 years old but, click ABR wave V latency reached maturity at the same age range. Researchers have suggested that difficulties with temporal interactions or retrieval may be associated with age.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In Külekçi, et al, (2007)'s article, recent research is described in which age-equivalent norms for a 500Hz logon evoked ABR could be obtained. The sample of the research was seventy-seven infants and children ranging from conceptional age of 40 weeks (term babies) to 4 years were tested with both click and tonal ABR without any risk factors for hearing loss.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%