2020 IEEE International Solid- State Circuits Conference - (ISSCC) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/isscc19947.2020.9062904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

9.2 a 134µw 24khz-bw 103.5db-dr ct ΔΣ modulator with chopped negative-r and tri-level fir dac

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with a [4], this design achieves similar energy efficiency and area while achieving 20× more BW. Although the FoM S of the negative-R CT M in [3] is nearly the same, this work achieves 7 dB more SNDR and occupies about the same area in an older technology node. To summarize, compared with the other audio ADCs, this design uses one of the lowest sampling frequencies to achieve the highest energy efficiency and the highest DR.…”
Section: Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Compared with a [4], this design achieves similar energy efficiency and area while achieving 20× more BW. Although the FoM S of the negative-R CT M in [3] is nearly the same, this work achieves 7 dB more SNDR and occupies about the same area in an older technology node. To summarize, compared with the other audio ADCs, this design uses one of the lowest sampling frequencies to achieve the highest energy efficiency and the highest DR.…”
Section: Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The high slew rates of out-of-band interferers may exceed the fine reference values predicted by the SAR ADC and overload the modulator [3], [5]. Although this problem can be solved by using a simple first-order LPF to limit the amplitude of such interferers, i.e., as an anti-overload filter, it does add to system complexity.…”
Section: Out-of-band Interferersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compared with a recent DT zoom ADC [4], this design achieves similar energy efficiency and area while achieving 20× more BW. Although the FoM S of the negative-R CT M in [3] is nearly the same, this work achieves 7 dB more SNDR and occupies about the same area in an older technology node. To summarize, compared with the other audio ADCs, this design uses one of the lowest sampling frequencies to achieve the highest energy efficiency and the highest DR.…”
Section: Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%