2012
DOI: 10.4086/toc.2012.v008a013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The adversary bound characterizes quantum query complexity up to a constant factor, as shown by Reichardt et al [21,18]. Previously, the adversary bound was used for formula evaluation [23,25], triangle and other subgraph detection [3,17,5], the k-distinctness problem [2], and learning symmetric juntas [4]. This paper demonstrates an application to property testing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The adversary bound characterizes quantum query complexity up to a constant factor, as shown by Reichardt et al [21,18]. Previously, the adversary bound was used for formula evaluation [23,25], triangle and other subgraph detection [3,17,5], the k-distinctness problem [2], and learning symmetric juntas [4]. This paper demonstrates an application to property testing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Span programs [18] were first introduced to the study of quantum algorithms by Reichardt and Špalek [24]. They have since proven to be immensely important for designing quantum algorithms in the query model.…”
Section: Span Programs and Quantum Query Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantum speed-ups for evaluating formulas like or [15] and the nand-tree [14] spurred interest in better understanding the performance of quantum algorithms for Boolean formulas. This research culminated in the development of span program algorithms [23,24], which can have optimal quantum query complexity for any problem [20]. Using span program algorithms, it was shown that O( √ N ) queries are sufficient for any read-once formula with N inputs [20,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such universal model was suggested by Childs 16 , and describes a single particle performing a quantum walk on a graph [17][18][19][20] . Quantum walk models have been shown to have an advantage over classical random walk, with 21,22 and without [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] a black-box. The model opens the door for using well-developed tools in physics for the study of quantum computation, such as scattering and localization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%