2008
DOI: 10.1109/isscc.2008.4523167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 0.1-to-1.5GHz 4.2mW All-Digital DLL with Dual Duty-Cycle Correction Circuit and Update Gear Circuit for DRAM in 66nm CMOS Technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the ADDLLs have the worse static phase error and jitter performance than the analog DLLs. The large amount of delay cells are normally deployed for wide operating frequency range and low jitter applications in ADDLLs [1], [2]. These open-loop ADDLLs are not able to track the clock skew caused by the PVT drift.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the ADDLLs have the worse static phase error and jitter performance than the analog DLLs. The large amount of delay cells are normally deployed for wide operating frequency range and low jitter applications in ADDLLs [1], [2]. These open-loop ADDLLs are not able to track the clock skew caused by the PVT drift.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To increase the bandwidth of DLL, the parameter "K" needs to be decreased. To guarantee performance in all process corners and various operating frequencies, "K" has to be a large integer number [3]. The proposed SDVS calculates the "K" value on the fly according to the process skew and the operating frequency.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%