2009 IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference 2009
DOI: 10.1109/cicc.2009.5280802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 5.5mA 2.4-GHz two-point modulation Zigbee transmitter with modulation gain calibration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In practice, the mismatch between the two transfer functions, arising from component spreads, requires some sort of calibration, which can be achieved by multiplying the modulation signal by a digital gain g 0 [2], [17], as shown in Fig. 5.…”
Section: Pll With Two-point-injection Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, the mismatch between the two transfer functions, arising from component spreads, requires some sort of calibration, which can be achieved by multiplying the modulation signal by a digital gain g 0 [2], [17], as shown in Fig. 5.…”
Section: Pll With Two-point-injection Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several CMOS ZigBee transceivers have been reported in recent years [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. The super heterodyne receiver which consumes much more power is not favorable for low power applications [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, it has some serious drawbacks, such as frequency drift, instability and high in-band phase noise. The VCO-based two-point modulation transmitter has an inherent mismatch of gain and phase in two modulation loops which will seriously degrade error vector magnitude (EVM) performance in practical applications [6,12]. These methods are still inadequate for achieving low power and cost transceivers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%