2012 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems 2012
DOI: 10.1109/iscas.2012.6271996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 51-dB SNDR DCO-based TDC using two-stage second-order noise shaping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since in many applications such as ADPLLs where TDCs function as a phase detector, we are only interested in the performance of TDCs over the loop bandwidth of the ADPLLs, system‐level approaches such as noise‐shaping obtained from ΔΣ operations can be utilised to reduce the quantisation noise of TDCs well below that of sampling TDCs over a specific frequency range [86]. These TDCs are termed noise‐shaping TDCs [6, 87–90]. Recent advance in TDCs utilises the intrinsic advantages of both resolution‐enhancing techniques such as interpolation in sampling TDCs and frequency‐dependent noise suppressing techniques such as ΔΣ operation of noise‐shaping TDCs simultaneously to improve the resolution of TDCs [91–93].…”
Section: Noise‐shaping Tdcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since in many applications such as ADPLLs where TDCs function as a phase detector, we are only interested in the performance of TDCs over the loop bandwidth of the ADPLLs, system‐level approaches such as noise‐shaping obtained from ΔΣ operations can be utilised to reduce the quantisation noise of TDCs well below that of sampling TDCs over a specific frequency range [86]. These TDCs are termed noise‐shaping TDCs [6, 87–90]. Recent advance in TDCs utilises the intrinsic advantages of both resolution‐enhancing techniques such as interpolation in sampling TDCs and frequency‐dependent noise suppressing techniques such as ΔΣ operation of noise‐shaping TDCs simultaneously to improve the resolution of TDCs [91–93].…”
Section: Noise‐shaping Tdcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The oscillator oscillates between two different oscillation states and becomes a switched ring oscillator (SRO), as shown in Fig. 16 [87, 90]. Since the charge of the capacitors at the output nodes of the oscillator at the end of ( k − 1)th phase is carried over in its entirety to the next k th phase, first‐order noise‐shaping characteristic intrinsic to GRO is preserved in SRO.…”
Section: Noise‐shaping Tdcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our proposed architecture, this frequency mismatch can be, however, compensated by a first-order LMS filter. The FSO presents advantages over a GRO by alleviating problems related to switching noise and transistor leakage [6]. In GRO's gating, the stored phase states are degraded or even lost.…”
Section: Proposed Frequency Shift Oscillator Tdc (Fsotdc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All-digital noise-shaping TDCs can be implemented using either an open-loop or a closed-loop approach. Open-loop ΔΣ TDCs utilise the first-order noise-shaping of gated or switched ring oscillators [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. The absence of a negative feedback mechanism makes these TDCs less resilience to the effect of PVT (process, voltage, temperature) uncertainty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%