2018 IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference (CICC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/cicc.2018.8357099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A −80dBm BLE-compliant, FSK wake-up receiver with system and within-bit dutycycling for scalable power and latency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…WuR power consumption falls in the µ W domain, but the IoT device often consumes several mW [114], although fractions of mW can be achieved in some cases [28]. Different works have integrated the capabilities of WuR technology into BLE devices [115][116][117]. In [118], a passive RF WuR device for a batteryless WSN is proposed.…”
Section: Rf Eh Antennamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WuR power consumption falls in the µ W domain, but the IoT device often consumes several mW [114], although fractions of mW can be achieved in some cases [28]. Different works have integrated the capabilities of WuR technology into BLE devices [115][116][117]. In [118], a passive RF WuR device for a batteryless WSN is proposed.…”
Section: Rf Eh Antennamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the low harvesting power density combined with the added power consumption of a WuR can worsen the intermittent behaviour of a batteryless device. Other works that have integrated the WuR capabilities in BLE are reported in [ 21 , 26 , 27 ]. These works focused on hardware design aspects of WuR-integration, while our work looks at protocol aspects instead.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While published optical WuRxs consume less power (<1nW) and are smaller (often single chip with integrated photodiode), their need for a steered laser at long range and their sensitivity to ambient light puts them in a different use case category. Table I compares this paper with selected prior RF/acoustic systems in more detail [5], [9], [24]- [30].…”
Section: B Benchmarkingmentioning
confidence: 99%