2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.08.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bayesian approach based on a Markov-chain Monte Carlo method for damage detection under unknown sources of variability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Papadimitriou and Papadioti introduced a component mode synthesis technique in a Bayesian FE model‐updating framework, for solving the forward analysis problem in a reduced space of generalized coordinates; the technique is demonstrated for damage identification applications on the Metsovo highway bridge (Greece) using simulated measurements. Figueiredo et al proposed a Bayesian approach for bridge damage detection based on the Markov chain Monte Carlo method with unknown sources of variability; the algorithm can detect structural damage using daily response data, even in the case of abnormal events such as the temperature variation; the proposed method was applied to damage detection of the Z‐24 bridge, and results show the proposed method has good robustness for damage detection. Ma et al proposed a new framework for predicting the remaining strength of bridges based on a Bayesian network and in situ load testing; the Bayesian network is developed to predict structural strength degradation under the influence of stiffness degradation, corrosion damage, load‐deflection response, and other factors; theoretical and experimental results of an existing reinforced concrete bridge show that the proposed method can improve the prediction accuracy.…”
Section: Recent Progress On Damage Identification Methods For Beam Brmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Papadimitriou and Papadioti introduced a component mode synthesis technique in a Bayesian FE model‐updating framework, for solving the forward analysis problem in a reduced space of generalized coordinates; the technique is demonstrated for damage identification applications on the Metsovo highway bridge (Greece) using simulated measurements. Figueiredo et al proposed a Bayesian approach for bridge damage detection based on the Markov chain Monte Carlo method with unknown sources of variability; the algorithm can detect structural damage using daily response data, even in the case of abnormal events such as the temperature variation; the proposed method was applied to damage detection of the Z‐24 bridge, and results show the proposed method has good robustness for damage detection. Ma et al proposed a new framework for predicting the remaining strength of bridges based on a Bayesian network and in situ load testing; the Bayesian network is developed to predict structural strength degradation under the influence of stiffness degradation, corrosion damage, load‐deflection response, and other factors; theoretical and experimental results of an existing reinforced concrete bridge show that the proposed method can improve the prediction accuracy.…”
Section: Recent Progress On Damage Identification Methods For Beam Brmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because minor damage does not cause large changes in structural dynamic responses. For long-term SHM, previous researches concentrated on the outlier detection by using several models such as statistical models, discriminant analysis and so on [6][7][8], while few works paid attention to the efficiency, especially in transmissibility based SHM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for vibration-based SHM, the core idea is to find a sensitive feature able to discriminate a damaged structure when compared to the baseline structure (healthy state); therefore the damage detection conclusion can be drawn out with choosing a threshold of the change, before and after damage, considering the influence of operational variety. As described in the introduction, lots of approaches, features, and measurement methodologies have been used in the past [2,3,26,27].…”
Section: Transmissibility Based Coherencementioning
confidence: 99%