2020
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msaa265
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bayesian Mutation–Selection Framework for Detecting Site-Specific Adaptive Evolution in Protein-Coding Genes

Abstract: In recent years, codon substitution models based on the mutation-selection principle have been extended for the purpose of detecting signatures of adaptive evolution in protein-coding genes. However, the approaches used to date have either focused on detecting global signals of adaptive regimes—across the entire gene—or on contexts where experimentally derived site-specific amino acid fitness profiles are available. Here, we present a Bayesian site-heterogeneous mutation-selection framework for site-specific d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mammalian β − globin is one of the datasets from Yang et al . (2000a) where positive selection has been inferred, and confirmed using many other studies and methods (e.g., Rodrigue et al . (2021)).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Mammalian β − globin is one of the datasets from Yang et al . (2000a) where positive selection has been inferred, and confirmed using many other studies and methods (e.g., Rodrigue et al . (2021)).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Mutation–selection models of codon substitution have been successfully used to study the distribution of selection coefficients in proteins ( Rodrigue et al 2010 ; Tamuri et al 2014 ), to detect selection shifts during adaptation ( Parto and Lartillot 2017 ), shifting balance ( Jones et al 2016 ), and to understand protein evolution given structural constraints ( Youssef et al 2020 ). Previous works have also accommodated a ω parameter within the mutation–selection model to detect adaptation at amino acid sites ( Yang and Nielsen 2008 ; Rodrigue and Lartillot 2017 ; Rodrigue et al 2021 ). However in these works ω is a separate parameter and not a function of the selection coefficients and thus its population genetics interpretation is not clear ( Rodrigue and Lartillot 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We ran the Bayesian software BayesCode (https://github.com/ThibaultLatrille/bayescode) on each protein-coding DNA alignment [49]. Each Monte-Carlo Markov-Chain (MCMC) is run during 2,000 points, with a burn-in of 1,000 points, to obtain the posterior mean of ω and ω 0 across the MCMC, as well as the 95% posterior credibility interval for genes and sites.…”
Section: Adaptation In Phylogeny-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%