2018
DOI: 10.1111/sjos.12332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bayesian semiparametric partially PH model for clustered time‐to‐event data

Abstract: A standard approach for dealing with unobserved heterogeneity and clustered time-to-event data within the proportional hazards (PH) context has been the introduction of a cluster-specific random effect (frailty), common to subjects within the same cluster. However, the conditional PH assumption could be too strong for some applications. For example, the marginal association of survival functions within a cluster does not depend on the subject-specific covariates. We propose an alternative partially PH modeling… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These approaches are reviewed by Hanson and Jara (2013). Other approaches to nonproportional hazards include Nieto-Barajas (2014) who introduces a semiparametric model based on increasing additive processes, Nipoti et al (2018) who propose a partially proportional hazards model using cluster-dependent random hazards, and Fernández et al (2016) who model the hazard as a logistic transform of a sum of Gaussian processes.…”
Section: = ∞mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These approaches are reviewed by Hanson and Jara (2013). Other approaches to nonproportional hazards include Nieto-Barajas (2014) who introduces a semiparametric model based on increasing additive processes, Nipoti et al (2018) who propose a partially proportional hazards model using cluster-dependent random hazards, and Fernández et al (2016) who model the hazard as a logistic transform of a sum of Gaussian processes.…”
Section: = ∞mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonparametric mixtures have been tailored to model survival data by choosing suitable kernels, such as gamma (Hanson, 2006), Weibull (Kottas, 2006) and Burr (Bohlouri Hajjar and Khazaei, 2018). Alternatively, nonparametric mixtures based on the use of mixing completely random measures have been deployed to model hazard functions (Dykstra and Laud, 1981;Nieto-Barajas and Walker, 2004), possibly accounting for the presence of covariates (see, e.g., Nieto- Barajas and Walker, 2005;Nipoti et al, 2018). Nonparametric mixtures for accelerated life models in the presence of covariates have been considered in Argiento et al (2014) and Liverani et al (2020), with the goal of producing cluster-specific posterior inference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These works paved the way for another active line of research that defines priors for the hazard rates by relaxing the dependence structure between the observables, going beyond the exchangeability assumption. For example, Pennell and Dunson [45], De Iorio et al [13] and Hanson, Jara and Zhao [25] model subject specific hazards based on continuous covariates; Lijoi and Nipoti [35] and Zhou et al [53] define priors for cluster specific hazards, while Nipoti, Jara and Guindani [43] account for both individual and cluster covariates simultaneously. In this work we rather focus on priors for the hazard rates of exchangeable time-to-event data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%