2019
DOI: 10.1177/1073110519840497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Belmont Reboot: Building a Normative Foundation for Human Research in the 21st Century

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
16

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
22
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…This consensus exists despite an apparent lack of agreement upon a theory or principles for when or why this should occur (Morreim 2018;Gilwa 2016), or regarding the definition of "actionable" for these purposes (Berg, Amendola, Eng et al 2013). This is consistent with arguments articulated in deliberations about genomic research that there is an obligation to return research findings that have utility for persons (Brothers et al 2019).…”
Section: Clinical Researchmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This consensus exists despite an apparent lack of agreement upon a theory or principles for when or why this should occur (Morreim 2018;Gilwa 2016), or regarding the definition of "actionable" for these purposes (Berg, Amendola, Eng et al 2013). This is consistent with arguments articulated in deliberations about genomic research that there is an obligation to return research findings that have utility for persons (Brothers et al 2019).…”
Section: Clinical Researchmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Decisions over how to return PCT-CFs therefore represent what Susan Wolf has termed elsewhere as a "bridge problem," challenging the dichotomy between research and clinical care that ethics and law have long embraced (Wolf 2013). This dissimilarity, however, is not unique to PCTs, but may instead reflect broader shifts in perceptions regarding the ethical obligations of researchers to participants (Brothers et al 2019).…”
Section: Clinical Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With human participants, the researchers employed the following core principles in the Belmont Report: respect for persons, beneficence, and justice (Brothers et al, 2019). Respect for the respondents was guaranteed through informed consent.…”
Section: Ethical Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los enfermeros participantes en este estudio fueron informados antes y durante todo el proceso que duro este trabajo, asimismo aceptaron su consentimiento informado para participar en el estudio. Se garantizó los principios básicos de la Bioética que son: autonomía, beneficencia, no maleficencia y justicia, que encuentran su base en el Reporte de Belmont y en el código de Helsinki (27,28) . Tabla 1.…”
Section: Consideraciones éTicasunclassified