A better ballot box?

Mercuri, Rebecca T.

doi:10.1109/mspec.2002.1038569

Cited by 110 publications

(45 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, associating credentials with identities or biometrics, such as social security numbers and finger-prints [47], may make it more difficult to sell credentials. Conversely, the introduction of such sensitive information into remote E-voting systems creates other privacy and security concerns [48]. Another way to prevent a seller from selling credentials is to make the proof of correctness of credentials non-transferable to buyers [30].…”

Section: Relation Among Receipt-freeness Vote-selling Resistance Anmentioning

confidence: 99%

Receipt-freeness and coercion resistance in remote E-voting systems

Ruan

Zou

2017

IJSN

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Remote Electronic Voting (E-voting) is a more convenient and efficient methodology when compared with traditional voting systems. It allows voters to vote for candidates remotely, however, remote E-voting systems have not yet been widely deployed in practical elections due to several potential security issues, such as vote-privacy, robustness and verifiability. Attackers' targets can be either voting machines or voters. In this paper, we mainly focus on three important security properties related to voters: receipt-freeness, voteselling resistance, and voter-coercion resistance. In such scenarios, voters are willing or forced to cooperate with attackers. We provide a survey of existing remote E-voting systems, to see whether or not they are able to satisfy these three properties to avoid corresponding attacks. Furthermore, we identify and summarize what mechanisms they use in order to satisfy these three security properties.

show abstract

Section: Relation Among Receipt-freeness Vote-selling Resistance Anmentioning

confidence: 99%

Receipt-freeness and coercion resistance in remote E-voting systems

Ruan

Zou

2017

IJSN

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This can also be considered as a direct recording electronic (DRE) [3] voting system in which the voter's choice is directly recorded on a server. By doing so, the voters are assured that their selection of the candidate has correctly captured and all eligible votes are correctly tallied.…”

Section: Need For Cryptographic Votingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Remote Internet voting: developing a secure and efficient frontend

George¹,

Sebastian

2013

CSIT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Electronic voting is an essential component of the e-governance of a country for establishing the people's choice in selecting the political leadership. Poll station voting is generally considered to be the most successful form of the election process. Both traditional and electronic versions of the poll station voting had many implementations in general elections, worldwide. The remote poll station voting scheme allows voters to participate in the election process if they have an access to any one of the poll station, no matter where they are at the time of voting. However, this scheme suffers from declining participation due to the inconvenience to the voters in reaching the poll stations. Also, this scheme needs a secure, private network for connecting the poll stations, making it very expensive. The remote Internet voting is very user convenient, which allows voting from any Internet connected computer, from anywhere. However, security, reliability and complexity issues have restricted the wider adoption of this scheme in large-scale elections. This paper proposes a secure and efficient frontend voting protocol using a trusted platform module for remote Internet voting with trusted third party authentication protocol.

show abstract

“…Voter verified paper audit trails A solution to improve the security of electronic voting that has become very popular in the US is the Voter Verified Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT), as proposed by Rebecca Mercuri [23]. This basically means that a voting machine not only stores the vote electronically but also produces a separate print of each vote, which can be used in case a recount is demanded.…”

Section: Techniquesmentioning

confidence: 99%