2022
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.775495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bibliometric Analysis of Endoscopic Sedation Research: 2001–2020

Abstract: Background and Aims: To evaluate endoscopic sedation research and predict research hot spots both quantitatively and qualitatively using bibliometric analysis.Methods: We extracted relevant publications from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) on 13 December 2020. We examined the retrieved data by bibliometric analysis (e.g., co-cited and cluster analysis, keyword co-occurrence) using the software CiteSpace and VOSviewer and the website of bibliometrics, the Online Analysis Platform of Literature Metrol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To reduce data bias, we used the Web of Science (Classic) Core Collection, one of the most comprehensive and authoritative databases ( 23 ), to perform an advanced search for literature, refined by articles from 2001 to 2021, and downloaded all the required data on January 1, 2022. The downloaded articles were stored in plain text in a newly-created folder titled “Data.” In the meantime, we also created a folder titled “Project” to store the data after analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To reduce data bias, we used the Web of Science (Classic) Core Collection, one of the most comprehensive and authoritative databases ( 23 ), to perform an advanced search for literature, refined by articles from 2001 to 2021, and downloaded all the required data on January 1, 2022. The downloaded articles were stored in plain text in a newly-created folder titled “Data.” In the meantime, we also created a folder titled “Project” to store the data after analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data imported into CiteSpace5.8 were selected by the following options: time-slicing was set to “2001–2021;” the number of years per slice was set to “1;” the selection criterion was set to “g-index;” and the scale factor k was set to “25” for the node type. Only one option at a time was selected for “author,” “institution,” “country,” “reference,” “cited author,” and “keyword.” Data imported into VOSviewer1.6.17 were used to create the term maps by using the following options: “Create a map based on bibliographic data,” “read data from bibliographic database files,” “type of analysis: co-occurrence,” “unit of analysis: all keywords,” “counting method: full counting,” and “minimum number of occurrences of a keyword: 25.” ( 23 )…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In patients undergoing complex endoscopic procedures, the current standard of practice is to administer sedative medication intravenously. Propofol-based sedation has become the first choice for endoscopic sedation over the last two decades because of its fast onset of action and short half-life[ 5 , 6 ]. Although there is compelling evidence to support the quality, cost effectiveness, and safety profile of the administration of propofol for EUS in the absence of an anesthesiologist[ 7 , 8 ], it is currently recommended that the administration and monitoring of propofol sedation for endoscopic procedures should be the responsibility of a dedicated and appropriately trained anesthetist only.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%