2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.03.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A biexponential DWI study in rat brain intracellular oedema

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where M is the signal in the presence of diffusion sensitization, M 0 is that in the absence of diffusion sensitization, fast ADC and slow ADC are ADC values, and P fast and P slow are the percentages of contributions to the signal from the fast- and slow-diffusing water compartments ( P fast = 1 − P slow ). [ 16 ]…”
Section: Ethodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where M is the signal in the presence of diffusion sensitization, M 0 is that in the absence of diffusion sensitization, fast ADC and slow ADC are ADC values, and P fast and P slow are the percentages of contributions to the signal from the fast- and slow-diffusing water compartments ( P fast = 1 − P slow ). [ 16 ]…”
Section: Ethodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon can be explained by a two‐component model. The diffusion of extracellular water molecules is fast with a high ADC, while that of intra‐cellular water molecules is slow, with a low ADC . Another explanation for the fast diffusion component is pseudodiffusion due to tissue perfusion .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another explanation for the fast diffusion component is pseudodiffusion due to tissue perfusion . Peritumoral edema is vasogenic edema, and the increased water molecules are in extracellular space . Although the signal intensity of a fast diffusion component decreases much faster than that of a slow diffusion component, the signal intensity may still remain high at a normal b‐value DWI in the peritumoral edema region due to the T 2 shine‐through effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another explanation for this model is that two components represent intra- and extra-cellular compartments, respectively (Niendorf et al, 1996 ; Steier et al, 2012 ). However, researchers have found that the attenuation of DWI signal does not obey the mono-exponential model even without extra-cellular compartment or even in a single cell (Grant et al, 2001 ; Schwarcz et al, 2004 ; Steier et al, 2012 ). These findings of previous studies also indicate that the bi-exponential model may not be a satisfying model for explaining the attenuation of DWI signal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the bi-exponential model is being challenged for the heterogeneity of its results across studies and its lack of reproducibility (Müller et al, 1998 ; Grant et al, 2001 ; Schwarcz et al, 2004 ; Koh et al, 2011 ; Steier et al, 2012 ; Hu et al, 2014 ; Lin et al, 2015 ). This model is considered oversimplified (Bisdas et al, 2013 ), and some researchers even speculate that there are continuous distributions of diffusion coefficients inside each voxel (Bennett et al, 2003 , 2006 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%