2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-02562-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A biosensor-based framework to measure latent proteostasis capacity

Abstract: The pool of quality control proteins (QC) that maintains protein-folding homeostasis (proteostasis) is dynamic but can become depleted in human disease. A challenge has been in quantitatively defining the depth of the QC pool. With a new biosensor, flow cytometry-based methods and mathematical modeling we measure the QC capacity to act as holdases and suppress biosensor aggregation. The biosensor system comprises a series of barnase kernels with differing folding stability that engage primarily with HSP70 and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
106
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To investigate whether the proteins that changed solubility upon Httex1 aggregation are relevant to protein homeostasis stress more generally, we expanded our analysis to examine proteome solubility changes associated with 5 other triggers of protein homeostasis stress that have previously reported roles leading to protein misfolding and aggregation. These stresses included three specific inhibitors of key protein homeostasis hubs (Hsp70, Hsp90 and the proteasome) whereby defects are reported in models of Huntington's disease, protein aggregation, degradation of misfolded proteins and-or other markers of protein homeostasis stress (9,22,23,(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43) and two exogenous stress states that reflect pathology observed in neurodegenerative disease settings and protein aggregation in cell models (namely, oxidative stress and ER stress) (44-50). The Hsp70 chaperone system was targeted by the small molecule inhibitor Ver-155008, which binds to the ATPase domain of Hsp70 family proteins (K d of 0.3 µM and IC 50 of 0.5 to 2.6 µM) (51, 52).…”
Section: Different Triggers Of Protein Homeostasis Stress Invoke Distmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To investigate whether the proteins that changed solubility upon Httex1 aggregation are relevant to protein homeostasis stress more generally, we expanded our analysis to examine proteome solubility changes associated with 5 other triggers of protein homeostasis stress that have previously reported roles leading to protein misfolding and aggregation. These stresses included three specific inhibitors of key protein homeostasis hubs (Hsp70, Hsp90 and the proteasome) whereby defects are reported in models of Huntington's disease, protein aggregation, degradation of misfolded proteins and-or other markers of protein homeostasis stress (9,22,23,(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43) and two exogenous stress states that reflect pathology observed in neurodegenerative disease settings and protein aggregation in cell models (namely, oxidative stress and ER stress) (44-50). The Hsp70 chaperone system was targeted by the small molecule inhibitor Ver-155008, which binds to the ATPase domain of Hsp70 family proteins (K d of 0.3 µM and IC 50 of 0.5 to 2.6 µM) (51, 52).…”
Section: Different Triggers Of Protein Homeostasis Stress Invoke Distmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Hsp70 chaperone system was targeted by the small molecule inhibitor Ver-155008, which binds to the ATPase domain of Hsp70 family proteins (K d of 0.3 µM and IC 50 of 0.5 to 2.6 µM) (51, 52). We have previously demonstrated Ver-155008 impairs protein homeostasis in cell culture models and can increase the aggregation propensity of an ectopically expressed metastable bait protein (38). Hsp90 was targeted with the ATP binding competitor novobiocin, which binds to the C-terminal nucleotide binding pocket to inhibit activity (40,42,43,53).…”
Section: Different Triggers Of Protein Homeostasis Stress Invoke Distmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To this end, fusion of fluorescent protein tags to these sensors or labeling with fluorescent probes has been utilized to visualize the sensors’ aggregation by observing fluorescent granules in live cells. These sensors are exemplified by destabilized client proteins that are fused to green fluorescent protein (GFP) (Gupta et al., ; Winkler et al., ), thermally labile proteins incorporating fluorescent unnatural amino acids (Hsieh et al., ), thermally labile proteins that are fused to a tetracysteine motif and labeled with FlAsH dye (Ignatova & Gierasch, ), destabilized retroaldolase enzyme that is labeled with a fluorophore (Liu, Zhang, Chen, Tan, & Kelly, ), destabilized barnase enzyme (Wood et al., ), GFP‐fused heat‐shock proteins (Pereira et al., ), and destabilized GFP (Waldo, Standish, Berendzen, & Terwilliger, ; Wigley, Stidham, Smith, Hunt, & Thomas, ). The limitation of these sensors is that they exhibit fluorescence before and after aggregation (i.e., they are non‐fluorogenic), so their aggregation can only be judged based on formation of fluorescent granules.…”
Section: Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within a compromised proteostasis, metastable protein sensors aggregate and produce measurable signal for detection. Examples are provided by firefly luciferase, a de novo designed retroaldolase, Halo‐Tag, and barnase . Thus, most present proteome stress sensors use aggregation of a specific metastable protein to flag proteome stress.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%