1985
DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(85)34065-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Clinical Comparison of Visual Field Testing With a New Automated Perimeter, the Humphrey Field Analyzer, and the Goldmann Perimeter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
69
1
7

Year Published

1987
1987
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
69
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The measurement of collicular threshold sensitivity used in this study has not been previously applied to this model and provides an indication of relative preservation of visual field. Its importance lies in the fact that there is evidence of some degree of correlation between the amounts of functional rescue and anatomical preservation and that the data collected compares with visual field perimetry testing in humans (27). A reliance on functional assessment is clearly preferable when providing background to clinical treatments, because it is not clear what relation commonly used measures, such as thickness of photoreceptor layer, have to degree of functional rescue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement of collicular threshold sensitivity used in this study has not been previously applied to this model and provides an indication of relative preservation of visual field. Its importance lies in the fact that there is evidence of some degree of correlation between the amounts of functional rescue and anatomical preservation and that the data collected compares with visual field perimetry testing in humans (27). A reliance on functional assessment is clearly preferable when providing background to clinical treatments, because it is not clear what relation commonly used measures, such as thickness of photoreceptor layer, have to degree of functional rescue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A PAE parece ser mais sensível que a PMC na detecção da perda glaucomatosa de campo visual (10)(11)(12) . No entanto, estes estudos enfatizaram casos iniciais de perda glaucomatosa do campo visual.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Na literatura não há um consenso quanto à superioridade de um perímetro em relação ao outro e cada um deles apresenta vantagens e desvantagens distintas, influenciadas pelo estágio da doença e outras variáveis relacionadas à realização do exame (11,(15)(16)(17) . É importante ressaltar que o objetivo do trabalho não é comparar os resultados campimétricos obtidos com os dois perí-metros, mas apenas demonstrar a importância da perimetria manual e cinética como uma alternativa aos exames computadorizados e estáticos em pacientes com dano glaucomatoso avançado.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Apresenta vantagens em relação à perimetria manual tais como exigir menor habilidade técnica do operador, apresentar menor variabilidade quando realizada por diferentes técnicos e ser mais padronizada (1)(2) . A perimetria computadorizada tem se mostrado comparável à perimetria manual na detecção da perda de campo visual no glaucoma (3) .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified