2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.2976132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Coarse-to-Fine Generalized-ICP Algorithm With Trimmed Strategy

Abstract: In this paper, we introduce a modified Generalized Iterative Closest Point (GICP) algorithm by presenting a coarse-to-fine strategy. Our contributions can be summarized as: Firstly, we use adaptively a plane-to-plane probabilistic matching model by gradually reducing the neighborhood range for given two point sets. It is an inner coarse-to-fine iteration process. Secondly, we use an outer coarse-to-fine strategy to bridge the point-to-point and plane-to-plane registration for refining the matching. Thirdly, we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PERCH 2.0 [21] uses GPU acceleration to significantly improve computational speed by employing GICP [37] and using parallel computing for rendering. However, ICP-based methods are susceptible to local minima [38], especially in cases of heavy occlusion. To overcome this problem, PERCH 2.0 generated a large set of initial pose hypotheses around the detected region of the target object.…”
Section: B Non-learning-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PERCH 2.0 [21] uses GPU acceleration to significantly improve computational speed by employing GICP [37] and using parallel computing for rendering. However, ICP-based methods are susceptible to local minima [38], especially in cases of heavy occlusion. To overcome this problem, PERCH 2.0 generated a large set of initial pose hypotheses around the detected region of the target object.…”
Section: B Non-learning-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare our coarse-to-fine registration algorithm with the Super4PCS coarse algorithm [33], the robust trimmed ICP [35], [36], and the coarse-to-fine adaptive generalized-ICP algorithm (AGICP) [37] We measure the error by the average of point-to-point distances, marked as TSD, on the overlap area of P and Q. Meanwhile, the stopping values of the trimmed ICP, AGICP and our fine registration method are: 1) The maximum iteration number τ = 200; 2) The TSD error ε η < e −10 ; and 3) |ε η − ε η−1 | < e −10 , respectively.…”
Section: A Experiments Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) our coarse trimmed module (named our coarse method), 4) the trimmed ICP [35], 5) AGICP [37], 6) our coarse-to-fine registration without denoising (named our method w/o denoising), 7) our coarse-to-fine registration method. In Figure 13, the first row is the data contaminated by noise N (0, 0.0003), and the second row is contaminated by N (0, 0.0007).…”
Section: Perturbation Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations