2018
DOI: 10.1109/tns.2018.2826141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Compact, Low Jitter, CMOS 65 nm 4.8–6 GHz Phase-Locked Loop for Applications in HEP Experiments Front-End Electronics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the phase noise characteristic of the SQVCO is slightly better than for the PQVCO due to the tail-noise filter [40] in the form of the coupling inductor present in the SQVCO. Table 1 presents a performance comparison of the implemented QVCOs with respect to previously reported VCOs [28,29,46,47] and QVCOs [33] which are studied under radiation (TID) exposure. Similar to [28], the implemented QVCOs in this work are targeted to operate in the s-band.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the phase noise characteristic of the SQVCO is slightly better than for the PQVCO due to the tail-noise filter [40] in the form of the coupling inductor present in the SQVCO. Table 1 presents a performance comparison of the implemented QVCOs with respect to previously reported VCOs [28,29,46,47] and QVCOs [33] which are studied under radiation (TID) exposure. Similar to [28], the implemented QVCOs in this work are targeted to operate in the s-band.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the phase noise characteristic of the SQVCO is slightly better than for the PQVCO due to the tail-noise filter [40] in the form of the coupling inductor present in the SQVCO. Table 1 presents a performance comparison of the implemented QVCOs with respect to previously reported VCOs [28,29,46,47] and QVCOs [33] which are studied under radiation (TID) exposure. Similar to [28], the implemented QVCOs in this work are targeted to operate in the s-band.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Table 2 , a comparison with the state-of-the-art rad-hard PLLs is performed. In [ 15 ], a CP-PLL in 65 nm technology for high-energy physics is presented. It generates a tunable output frequency in the range of 4.8–6 GHz, which is slightly lower the SpaceFibre standard.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It generates a tunable output frequency in the range of 4.8–6 GHz, which is slightly lower the SpaceFibre standard. As reported in [ 15 ], the CP-PLL was not designed to be SEE tolerant; indeed, a simple PFD was used in the PLL loop. Instead, in this work, a TMR PFD was implemented to increase the hardness against SEE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation