2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6105(00)00022-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative analysis of correction method for total-head probes in large velocity-gradient flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Actually, the position of the pressure point, especially that of the dynamic pressure varies with Renault number. The total pressure point is not so accurate in industrial application [20]. Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, the position of the pressure point, especially that of the dynamic pressure varies with Renault number. The total pressure point is not so accurate in industrial application [20]. Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bouhy summarized the evolution process and the required working conditions of Pitot tube, and put forward the onsite correction factor to diminish the error due to improper installations [2]. Wysocki et al presented the optimal mounting location of a Pitot tube by comparing the measurement accuracy of Pitot tubes placed at different distances from an elbow, a valve or an obstacle [3]. Gao analyzed the influencing factors on Pitot tube measurement such as the fluid density, pressure loss, flow field variation, temperature, humidity etc [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%