2016
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2772569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Analysis of Tools to Limit the Procyclicality of Initial Margin Requirements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This way, when volatility is low the margins are fixed at a conservative floor level that corresponds historically to about 29% quantile of the lowest margins for SPX, and at the time of market stress they can't go above the upper threshold. It is an interesting coincidence that the estimated lower threshold for SPX using the EWMA model corresponds to the 25% of observations in the lower regime, as was also suggested by Murphy et al (2016). For TSX, the margin buffer is a higher 32% of observations on average.…”
Section: Figures 9 and 10 Heresupporting
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This way, when volatility is low the margins are fixed at a conservative floor level that corresponds historically to about 29% quantile of the lowest margins for SPX, and at the time of market stress they can't go above the upper threshold. It is an interesting coincidence that the estimated lower threshold for SPX using the EWMA model corresponds to the 25% of observations in the lower regime, as was also suggested by Murphy et al (2016). For TSX, the margin buffer is a higher 32% of observations on average.…”
Section: Figures 9 and 10 Heresupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The CCPs, by acting as intermediary, have exposure to both the buyer and the seller. The initial margins are typically set by CCPs based on VaR models (Murphy et al (2016), Knott and Polenghi (2006)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our paper is also related to studies on margin procyclicality (see e.g. Murphy et al, 2014Murphy et al, , 2016 and price procyclicality (see e.g. Danielsson et al, 2012;Danielsson and Zigrand, 2008).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 81%