2009
DOI: 10.1504/ijstl.2009.024494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative assessment of service quality perspectives and satisfaction in ports: evidence from Nigeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, despite voluminous research in the area, no unanimity has been achieved regarding the dimensions of service quality and the linkages between satisfaction, quality and loyalty (e.g., Asubonteng et al, 1996;Carrillat et al, 2006). For instance, there are differences in the dimensional structure and measures of service quality models for different industries and countries (Ladhari, 2008;Ugboma et al, 2009), and much of the literature on service quality has focused on end-consumers rather than business customers (Chumpitaz and Paparoidamis, 2007).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite voluminous research in the area, no unanimity has been achieved regarding the dimensions of service quality and the linkages between satisfaction, quality and loyalty (e.g., Asubonteng et al, 1996;Carrillat et al, 2006). For instance, there are differences in the dimensional structure and measures of service quality models for different industries and countries (Ladhari, 2008;Ugboma et al, 2009), and much of the literature on service quality has focused on end-consumers rather than business customers (Chumpitaz and Paparoidamis, 2007).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A two-dimensional graph with mean or median importance and performance ratings on each axis (referred to as an importance-performance space) is used to assess how resources should be applied to maximizing customer satisfaction and service quality. The approach has been applied in numerous fields since then, including education [14,24], food services [25], tourism [26], government services [27], and professional training [28].…”
Section: The Literature On Our Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These can be expanded to include externally generated information, such as users' perspectives on port choices [9,10] and port attractiveness [11]. There are also few recent attempts [12][13][14] to assess port users' satisfaction via the application of SERVQUAL, a well-known multi-item scale developed to assess customer perceptions of service quality in service and retail businesses. The SERVQUAL scale decomposes the notion of service quality into five constructs (i.e., tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy).…”
Section: Effectiveness Measurement In Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the five dimensions of SERVQUAL can be interpreted differently when applied in different industries [4,8,15]. Several researchers also indicated that the importance and trustworthiness of SERVQUAL instruments may be appreciated by their widespread use in a variety of service settings (i.e., hotel, health, air transport, marine transport, tourism and so on) [19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Quality and Service Quality Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%