2017 IEEE 17th International Conference on Nanotechnology (IEEE-NANO) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/nano.2017.8117443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative performance analysis of 10 nm Si nanowire and carbon nanotube field effect transistors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The theory of ballistic nanotransistors [8] implies that the application of electric field between the drain and the source of a nanotransistor would induce a non‐equilibrium mobile charge in the channel according to [16] normalΔQ=)(NS+NDN0. Here, NS, ND and N0 are densities of the positive charges filled by the source, density of the negative charges filled by the drain and equilibrium charge densities, respectively. These densities are determined by the Fermi–Dirac probability distribution as thickmathspaceNS=12+D)(Ef)(EUnormalSFthinmathspacenormaldE. ND=12+D)(Ef)(EUnormalDFthinmathspacenormaldE. N0=normal∞+normal∞DEfEEnormalFdE. Here, D)(E is the density of states contributed by the lower sub‐band; EF is the Fermi level; f is the Fermi probability function; and E represents the energy levels per nanotube unit length, whereas …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The theory of ballistic nanotransistors [8] implies that the application of electric field between the drain and the source of a nanotransistor would induce a non‐equilibrium mobile charge in the channel according to [16] normalΔQ=)(NS+NDN0. Here, NS, ND and N0 are densities of the positive charges filled by the source, density of the negative charges filled by the drain and equilibrium charge densities, respectively. These densities are determined by the Fermi–Dirac probability distribution as thickmathspaceNS=12+D)(Ef)(EUnormalSFthinmathspacenormaldE. ND=12+D)(Ef)(EUnormalDFthinmathspacenormaldE. N0=normal∞+normal∞DEfEEnormalFdE. Here, D)(E is the density of states contributed by the lower sub‐band; EF is the Fermi level; f is the Fermi probability function; and E represents the energy levels per nanotube unit length, whereas …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous works [16] have emphasised on the development of equations for the transmission coefficient due to phonon scattering. The effective phonon scattering mean free path in semiconducting nanotubes can be computed by equations [8–11] right leftthickmathspace.5em1lsc(Vx)=1lap][111+efalse(false(EFVSC+qVxthickmathspacefalse)/KTfalse)+1lop][111+efalse(false(EFqVSChωnormalop+qVxthickmathspacefalse)/KTfalse). TS=lnormalSC)(0lnormalSC)(0+L. TD=lnormalSC)(VnormalDSefflnormalSC)(VnormalDSeff+L. right leftthickmathspace.5emIDSP=2qkTπ...…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations