2012
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61766-8
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

Abstract: Summary Background Quantification of the disease burden caused by different risks informs prevention by providing an account of health loss different to that provided by a disease-by-disease analysis. No complete revision of global disease burden caused by risk factors has been done since a comparative risk assessment in 2000, and no previous analysis has assessed changes in burden attributable to risk factors over time. Methods We estimated deaths and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs; sum of years liv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

95
7,449
9
262

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10,343 publications
(7,933 citation statements)
references
References 171 publications
95
7,449
9
262
Order By: Relevance
“…The included studies modeled both particulate and gaseous pollutants such as particulate matter (PM) less than 2.5 µm and less than 10 µm (PM2.5 and PM10), sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide (NO 2) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide, ammonia, etc. However, PM2.5 was primarily used for health impact calculations because of its strong association with health outcomes [54], because it is an indicator that can avoid double counting [42], and because of the difficulty in determining the exposure with other gaseous pollutants and the nonsignificant association between gaseous pollutants and health outcomes [49,55]. Woodcock et al [35] modeled PM10 assuming that changes in PM10 concentration within transport scenarios were in the PM2.5 size range.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The included studies modeled both particulate and gaseous pollutants such as particulate matter (PM) less than 2.5 µm and less than 10 µm (PM2.5 and PM10), sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide (NO 2) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide, ammonia, etc. However, PM2.5 was primarily used for health impact calculations because of its strong association with health outcomes [54], because it is an indicator that can avoid double counting [42], and because of the difficulty in determining the exposure with other gaseous pollutants and the nonsignificant association between gaseous pollutants and health outcomes [49,55]. Woodcock et al [35] modeled PM10 assuming that changes in PM10 concentration within transport scenarios were in the PM2.5 size range.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suboptimal lifestyle is the major cause of NCDs, including poor diet, physical inactivity, tobacco, adiposity, and excess alcohol 2. Clearly, novel interventions to improve lifestyle and prevent NCDs are urgently required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negative consequences of smoking are well documented globally; they include overall diminished health and diseases of almost all the organs as well as harm to both mother and foetus when mothers smoke during pregnancy [1,2]. The effects of second-hand smoke are also considerable: sudden infant death syndrome, middle-ear diseases, respiratory diseases, coronary heart diseases, stroke and lung cancer across genders, as well as impacts on the reproductive health of women [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of second-hand smoke are also considerable: sudden infant death syndrome, middle-ear diseases, respiratory diseases, coronary heart diseases, stroke and lung cancer across genders, as well as impacts on the reproductive health of women [3,4]. The direct and indirect costs of smoking, in terms of health service use for diseases attributable to smoking and productivity loss from smoking-related morbidity and mortality, represent a significant burden to individuals, families and societies [1,2,4]. This burden is especially pronounced in low- and middle-income countries, exacerbating impoverishment and hindering social and economic development [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%