2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of Ni75Fe25 microcomponents fabricated by microelectroforming and micromolding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Employing elastic polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) molds created through soft lithography as microelectroforming molds effectively overcomes the limitations associated with photoresist molds. The PDMS molds can be readily replicated from microstructured masters by soft lithography, offering a cost-effective alternative [26][27][28]. In our previous work, we have achieved the fabrication of metallic microstructures utilizing the microelectroforming method with a silver (Ag)coated PDMS mold.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Employing elastic polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) molds created through soft lithography as microelectroforming molds effectively overcomes the limitations associated with photoresist molds. The PDMS molds can be readily replicated from microstructured masters by soft lithography, offering a cost-effective alternative [26][27][28]. In our previous work, we have achieved the fabrication of metallic microstructures utilizing the microelectroforming method with a silver (Ag)coated PDMS mold.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%