2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.11.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of planar and mesoporous perovskite solar cells with printable carbon electrodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this structure, the contact area between the Perovskite and the ETL is increased, which makes the collection of electrons easier [43]. Furthermore, mesoscopic perovskite solar cells present a lower density of traps and less hysteresis compared to the planar architecture [43,44]. Moreover, this kind of solar cell exhibit better stability and performance than the planar solar cells [45,46].…”
Section: Evolution Of the Structure Of Perovskite Solar Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this structure, the contact area between the Perovskite and the ETL is increased, which makes the collection of electrons easier [43]. Furthermore, mesoscopic perovskite solar cells present a lower density of traps and less hysteresis compared to the planar architecture [43,44]. Moreover, this kind of solar cell exhibit better stability and performance than the planar solar cells [45,46].…”
Section: Evolution Of the Structure Of Perovskite Solar Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[101] While analyzing, FTO/TiO 2 /MAPbI 3 /C device structure, the mesoporous PSC shows a PCE of 11.37% whereas, the planar PSC shows a PCE of 5.27%. [102] Figure 11. Printed layers of photovoltaic solar cells.…”
Section: Active Layer Pce [%] Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is mainly due to the large contact area between the mesoporous ETL and the perovskite layer, which promotes the electron transport process. [49,[58][59][60][61] Comparison of the HI values and photovoltaic performance of PSCs with planar and mesoporous structures are shown in Table 1. Similarly, because the Al 2 O 3 used in the super-mesoporous PSCs is an insulating scaffold and lacks the existence of c-TiO 2 layer, electron transport can only be completed by the perovskite itself, finally result in slower charge separation and transport rate.…”
Section: The Influence Of Device Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%