2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2012.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of spacecraft attitude determination and estimation algorithms (a cost–benefit approach)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[2] presents a significant platform to achieve a cost-benefit approach to implement the methodologies for attitude dynamics but lacks a practical exposure. [3] shows a better understanding of attitude estimation techniques to be implemented but do not discuss about the system development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2] presents a significant platform to achieve a cost-benefit approach to implement the methodologies for attitude dynamics but lacks a practical exposure. [3] shows a better understanding of attitude estimation techniques to be implemented but do not discuss about the system development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where: E is the expectation, k X is the true plant state vector, and ^k X is the estimated state vector [1]. The discrete Kalman filter structure given in [17] is based on:…”
Section: Kalman Filter Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimation algorithm combines measurements in different ways to attain the required attitude estimation accuracy. In comparison with attitude determination algorithms (such as TRIAD and the Q-method), attitude estimation methods (such as the Kalman filter) are able to work with measurements of even a single attitude sensor which is an important advantage [1]. Over 50 years, the Kalman filter is still one of the most widely used data fusion systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus it is possible to obtain attitude estimation that is better than single sensor observation accuracy. Or in other words, to fulfill the same attitude determination accuracy requirement of a system, it presumably decreases the demand in performance indices of each sensor, remarkably reducing the total budget of the attitude determination system [4]. However, the characteristics of different sensors differ greatly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%